head to head · open source

Ladybird vs buster

Ladybird has 66,237 GitHub stars, 3,163 forks, 535 open issues and last shipped yesterday. buster has 9,302 stars, 694 forks, 50 open issues and last shipped 3 months ago. Ladybird leads on adoption by 612% (66,237 vs 9,302 stars). Ladybird is written in C++ under BSD-2-Clause; buster is written in JavaScript under GPL-3.0. Ladybird has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, buster 7%. Ladybird was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Ladybird ★ 66K buster ★ 9.3K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Ladybird buster
GitHub stars ★ 66K ★ 9.3K
License BSD-2-Clause GPL-3.0
Written in C++ JavaScript
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-06-27
Forks ⑂ 3.2K ⑂ 694
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Ladybird if

  • You weight community size — 66K stars and counting
  • You want the BSD-2-Clause license terms
  • Your stack matches C++
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Ladybird profile →

pick buster if

  • You want the buster feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and buster fits your workflow better

full buster profile →

About Ladybird

Ladybird is a truly independent web browser and browser engine, written from scratch in C++ rather than as a fork of any existing engine, and it is built for developers who want to work on a browser engine based on web standards while it remains in a pre alpha state.

read the full Ladybird overview →

About buster

Buster is a free, open source browser extension for Chrome, Edge and Firefox that helps people solve difficult CAPTCHA challenges by completing reCAPTCHA audio challenges with speech recognition, and it is intended for ordinary human users rather than automation operators.

read the full buster overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K Browser Use ★ 115K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K

Related comparisons

ublock vs ladybird ladybird vs chrome-devtools-mcp ladybird vs monaco-editor ladybird vs zen-browser ublock vs chrome-devtools-mcp ublock vs monaco-editor ublock vs zen-browser ublock vs servo n8n vs browser-use n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces n8n vs skyvern n8n vs automa n8n vs livekit n8n vs obs-studio n8n vs sharex n8n vs kap excalidraw vs obs-studio n8n vs snapify excalidraw vs sharex excalidraw vs kap excalidraw vs snapify

More Browsers & Extensions projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Browsers & Extensions field.

Ladybird vs uBlock Ladybird vs chrome-devtools-mcp Ladybird vs monaco-editor Ladybird vs Zen Browser Ladybird vs servo Ladybird vs serenity Ladybird vs refined-github Ladybird vs slate Ladybird vs Avalonia Ladybird vs webtorrent Ladybird vs fingerprintjs Ladybird vs obscura

Frequently asked questions

Is Ladybird or buster more popular?

Ladybird has 66,237 GitHub stars and buster has 9,302. Ladybird has the larger community by that measure.

Are Ladybird and buster free?

Both are open source. Ladybird is licensed under BSD-2-Clause and buster under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Ladybird and buster?

Ladybird is written in C++ and buster in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Ladybird or buster?

Choose Ladybird if you want the larger community (66,237 stars) or its BSD-2-Clause licence terms. Choose buster if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.