head to head · open source
Ladybird vs brie-extension
Ladybird has 66,807 GitHub stars, 3,194 forks, 535 open issues and last shipped yesterday. brie-extension has 724 stars, 51 forks, 25 open issues and last shipped 5 months ago. Ladybird leads on adoption by 9,127% (66,807 vs 724 stars). Ladybird is written in C++ under BSD-2-Clause; brie-extension is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0. Ladybird has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, brie-extension 7%. Ladybird was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Ladybird | brie-extension | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 67K | ★ 724 |
| License | BSD-2-Clause | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | C++ | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-06-15 |
| Forks | ⑂ 3.2K | ⑂ 51 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Ladybird if
- You weight community size — 67K stars and counting
- You want the BSD-2-Clause license terms
- Your stack matches C++
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick brie-extension if
- You want the brie-extension feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and brie-extension fits your workflow better
About Ladybird
Ladybird Ladybird is a truly independent web browser, using a novel engine based on web standards. [!IMPORTANT] Ladybird is in a pre alpha state, and only suitable for use by developers Features We aim to build a complete, usable browser for the modern web. Ladybird uses a multi process architecture with a main UI process, several WebContent renderer processes, an ImageDecoder process, and a RequestServer process. Image decoding and network connections are done out of process to be more robust against malicious content. Each tab has its own renderer process, which is sandboxed from the rest of the system. At the…
read the full Ladybird overview →
About brie-extension
⚡️ Capture screenshots, console errors, network issues, and user actions, giving developers full context instantly. Website • Docs • Discord 🚀 Capture & Share Instantly: Record exactly what went wrong, no more back and forth emails or messy screenshots. 🛠️ Developer Ready Reports: Brie auto captures console logs, network errors, and user actions so devs get full context instantly. 🕒 Save Time, Build Faster: No wasted hours on unclear bug reports, just fast fixes and better software. 🔥 Join Thousands of Fast Moving Teams: Install Brie and start shipping bug free software today! 💫 Quickstart 1. Add Brie from…
read the full brie-extension overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More Browsers & Extensions projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Browsers & Extensions field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Ladybird or brie-extension more popular?
Ladybird has 66,807 GitHub stars and brie-extension has 724. Ladybird has the larger community by that measure.
Are Ladybird and brie-extension free?
Both are open source. Ladybird is licensed under BSD-2-Clause and brie-extension under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Ladybird and brie-extension?
Ladybird is written in C++ and brie-extension in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Ladybird or brie-extension?
Choose Ladybird if you want the larger community (66,807 stars) or its BSD-2-Clause licence terms. Choose brie-extension if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.