head to head · open source
Ladybird vs BilibiliSponsorBlock
Ladybird has 66,807 GitHub stars, 3,194 forks, 535 open issues and last shipped yesterday. BilibiliSponsorBlock has 6,303 stars, 145 forks, 54 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Ladybird leads on adoption by 960% (66,807 vs 6,303 stars). Ladybird is written in C++ under BSD-2-Clause; BilibiliSponsorBlock is written in TypeScript under GPL-3.0. Ladybird has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, BilibiliSponsorBlock 2%. Ladybird was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Ladybird | BilibiliSponsorBlock | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 67K | ★ 6.3K |
| License | BSD-2-Clause | GPL-3.0 |
| Written in | C++ | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-01 |
| Forks | ⑂ 3.2K | ⑂ 145 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Ladybird if
- You weight community size — 67K stars and counting
- You want the BSD-2-Clause license terms
- Your stack matches C++
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick BilibiliSponsorBlock if
- You want the BilibiliSponsorBlock feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and BilibiliSponsorBlock fits your workflow better
About Ladybird
Ladybird Ladybird is a truly independent web browser, using a novel engine based on web standards. [!IMPORTANT] Ladybird is in a pre alpha state, and only suitable for use by developers Features We aim to build a complete, usable browser for the modern web. Ladybird uses a multi process architecture with a main UI process, several WebContent renderer processes, an ImageDecoder process, and a RequestServer process. Image decoding and network connections are done out of process to be more robust against malicious content. Each tab has its own renderer process, which is sandboxed from the rest of the system. At the…
read the full Ladybird overview →
About BilibiliSponsorBlock
Logo by @munadikieh . Modified by Yaodong 小电视空降助手 受够了视频中无处不在的赞助广告了吗？受够了看了一半才发现的软广视频了吗？小电视空降助手是一款帮你精准空降到广告之后的浏览器插件。插件自动获取并跳过广告片段，让你的视频体验毫无中断！ 除了广告之外，插件还支持跳过其他类别的片段，例如开场结尾的动画、一键三连提示，或者直接空降到视频封面的位置。插件中所有的标注片段都来自网友标注，您也可以提交自己的片段来为空降指挥部添砖加瓦。 想知道大佬们提交了多少片段？在排行榜看看吧。 目前本项目由我个人在业余时间维护，如果你想支持我，欢迎查看赞助。 本插件移植自插件SponsorBlock，保留了大部分的 UI 和使用方法，加入了一些小电视特色的功能。 安装 目前上架了Chrome 应用商店，火狐应用商店。如果你知道更多流行的浏览器插件商店，欢迎留言 如果你无法打开上面的商店，可以尝试从 GitHub Release 页面获取未打包的插件。 1. 根据您浏览器的类型下载适合的版本，Chrome、Edge、360 和基于 Chromium 的国产浏览器下载 ChromiumExtension.zip ；火狐浏览器下载 FirefoxExtension.zip 。并解压缩。 1. 打开浏览器的插件管理页面，启用“开发者模式”，点击 加载已解压的扩展程序
read the full BilibiliSponsorBlock overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More Browsers & Extensions projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Browsers & Extensions field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Ladybird or BilibiliSponsorBlock more popular?
Ladybird has 66,807 GitHub stars and BilibiliSponsorBlock has 6,303. Ladybird has the larger community by that measure.
Are Ladybird and BilibiliSponsorBlock free?
Both are open source. Ladybird is licensed under BSD-2-Clause and BilibiliSponsorBlock under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Ladybird and BilibiliSponsorBlock?
Ladybird is written in C++ and BilibiliSponsorBlock in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Ladybird or BilibiliSponsorBlock?
Choose Ladybird if you want the larger community (66,807 stars) or its BSD-2-Clause licence terms. Choose BilibiliSponsorBlock if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.