head to head · open source
Ladybird vs auto-tab-discard
Ladybird has 66,240 GitHub stars, 3,162 forks, 535 open issues and last shipped today. auto-tab-discard has 1,206 stars, 107 forks, 189 open issues and last shipped 13 days ago. Ladybird leads on adoption by 5,393% (66,240 vs 1,206 stars). Ladybird is written in C++ under BSD-2-Clause; auto-tab-discard is written in JavaScript under MPL-2.0. Ladybird has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, auto-tab-discard 9%. Ladybird was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Ladybird | auto-tab-discard | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 66K | ★ 1.2K |
| License | BSD-2-Clause | MPL-2.0 |
| Written in | C++ | JavaScript |
| Last push | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-05 |
| Forks | ⑂ 3.2K | ⑂ 107 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Ladybird if
- You weight community size — 66K stars and counting
- You want the BSD-2-Clause license terms
- Your stack matches C++
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick auto-tab-discard if
- You want the auto-tab-discard feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MPL-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You evaluated both and auto-tab-discard fits your workflow better
About Ladybird
Ladybird is a truly independent web browser and browser engine, written from scratch in C++ rather than as a fork of any existing engine, and it is built for developers who want to work on a browser engine based on web standards while it remains in a pre alpha state.
read the full Ladybird overview →
About auto-tab-discard
Auto Tab Discard A browser extension which uses the native tab discarding method ( chrome.tabs.discard ) to automatically reduce memory usage of inactive tabs. This extension is more efficient and should be less buggy compared to the alternatives extensions that use DOM replacement method. Preview Links Homepage: Privacy Policy: Chrome: Edge: Firefox: Opera: Product Review: Preview:
read the full auto-tab-discard overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More Browsers & Extensions projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Browsers & Extensions field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Ladybird or auto-tab-discard more popular?
Ladybird has 66,240 GitHub stars and auto-tab-discard has 1,206. Ladybird has the larger community by that measure.
Are Ladybird and auto-tab-discard free?
Both are open source. Ladybird is licensed under BSD-2-Clause and auto-tab-discard under MPL-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Ladybird and auto-tab-discard?
Ladybird is written in C++ and auto-tab-discard in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Ladybird or auto-tab-discard?
Choose Ladybird if you want the larger community (66,240 stars) or its BSD-2-Clause licence terms. Choose auto-tab-discard if its feature set, stack or MPL-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.