head to head · open source
Ladybird vs artillery
Ladybird has 66,807 GitHub stars, 3,194 forks, 535 open issues and last shipped yesterday. artillery has 9,111 stars, 575 forks, 487 open issues and last shipped 14 days ago. Ladybird leads on adoption by 633% (66,807 vs 9,111 stars). Ladybird is written in C++ under BSD-2-Clause; artillery is written in TypeScript under MPL-2.0. Ladybird has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, artillery 6%. Ladybird was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (browser), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Ladybird | artillery | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 67K | ★ 9.1K |
| License | BSD-2-Clause | MPL-2.0 |
| Written in | C++ | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-20 |
| Forks | ⑂ 3.2K | ⑂ 575 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Ladybird if
- You weight community size — 67K stars and counting
- You want the BSD-2-Clause license terms
- Your stack matches C++
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick artillery if
- You want the artillery feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MPL-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and artillery fits your workflow better
About Ladybird
Ladybird Ladybird is a truly independent web browser, using a novel engine based on web standards. [!IMPORTANT] Ladybird is in a pre alpha state, and only suitable for use by developers Features We aim to build a complete, usable browser for the modern web. Ladybird uses a multi process architecture with a main UI process, several WebContent renderer processes, an ImageDecoder process, and a RequestServer process. Image decoding and network connections are done out of process to be more robust against malicious content. Each tab has its own renderer process, which is sandboxed from the rest of the system. At the…
read the full Ladybird overview →
About artillery
Artillery Docs Discussions @artilleryio Features Test at cloud scale. Cloud native distributed load testing at scale, out of the box and for free . Scale out your load tests on top of AWS Lambda or AWS Fargate. No DevOps needed, zero infrastructure to set up or manage. Test with Playwright . Load test with real headless browsers. Batteries included. 20+ integrations for monitoring, observability, and CICD. Test anything . HTTP, WebSocket, Socket.io, gRPC, Kinesis, and more. Powerful workload modeling . Emulate complex user behavior with request chains, multiple steps, transactions, and more. Extensible &…
read the full artillery overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More Browsers & Extensions projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Browsers & Extensions field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Ladybird or artillery more popular?
Ladybird has 66,807 GitHub stars and artillery has 9,111. Ladybird has the larger community by that measure.
Are Ladybird and artillery free?
Both are open source. Ladybird is licensed under BSD-2-Clause and artillery under MPL-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Ladybird and artillery?
Ladybird is written in C++ and artillery in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Ladybird or artillery?
Choose Ladybird if you want the larger community (66,807 stars) or its BSD-2-Clause licence terms. Choose artillery if its feature set, stack or MPL-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.