head to head · open source
Ladybird vs archiveweb.page
Ladybird has 66,807 GitHub stars, 3,194 forks, 535 open issues and last shipped yesterday. archiveweb.page has 1,611 stars, 116 forks, 111 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. Ladybird leads on adoption by 4,047% (66,807 vs 1,611 stars). Ladybird is written in C++ under BSD-2-Clause; archiveweb.page is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0. Ladybird has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, archiveweb.page 7%. Ladybird was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Ladybird | archiveweb.page | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 67K | ★ 1.6K |
| License | BSD-2-Clause | AGPL-3.0 |
| Written in | C++ | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-09-04 |
| Forks | ⑂ 3.2K | ⑂ 116 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Ladybird if
- You weight community size — 67K stars and counting
- You want the BSD-2-Clause license terms
- Your stack matches C++
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick archiveweb.page if
- You want the archiveweb.page feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and archiveweb.page fits your workflow better
About Ladybird
Ladybird Ladybird is a truly independent web browser, using a novel engine based on web standards. [!IMPORTANT] Ladybird is in a pre alpha state, and only suitable for use by developers Features We aim to build a complete, usable browser for the modern web. Ladybird uses a multi process architecture with a main UI process, several WebContent renderer processes, an ImageDecoder process, and a RequestServer process. Image decoding and network connections are done out of process to be more robust against malicious content. Each tab has its own renderer process, which is sandboxed from the rest of the system. At the…
read the full Ladybird overview →
About archiveweb.page
ArchiveWeb.page is a JavaScript based application for interactive, high fidelity web archiving that runs directly in the browser. The system can be used as a Chrome/Chromium based browser extension and also as a standalone Electron app. The system creates, stores, and replays high fidelity web archives stored directly in the browser's storage (via IndexedDB). For more detailed info on how to use the extension and standalone app, see the ArchiveWeb.page User Guide. The browser extension is available on the Chrome Web Store. Downloads for the desktop are are available on the GitHub Releases page. Architecture The…
read the full archiveweb.page overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More Browsers & Extensions projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Browsers & Extensions field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Ladybird or archiveweb.page more popular?
Ladybird has 66,807 GitHub stars and archiveweb.page has 1,611. Ladybird has the larger community by that measure.
Are Ladybird and archiveweb.page free?
Both are open source. Ladybird is licensed under BSD-2-Clause and archiveweb.page under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Ladybird and archiveweb.page?
Ladybird is written in C++ and archiveweb.page in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Ladybird or archiveweb.page?
Choose Ladybird if you want the larger community (66,807 stars) or its BSD-2-Clause licence terms. Choose archiveweb.page if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.