head to head · open source

kyverno vs pwndoc

kyverno has 8,168 GitHub stars, 1,602 forks, 703 open issues and last shipped yesterday. pwndoc has 2,895 stars, 519 forks, 122 open issues and last shipped 11 days ago. kyverno leads on adoption by 182% (8,168 vs 2,895 stars). kyverno is written in Go under Apache-2.0; pwndoc is written in JavaScript under MIT. kyverno has attracted 20% as many forks as stars, pwndoc 18%. kyverno was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (security), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

kyverno ★ 8.2K pwndoc ★ 2.9K category Business Software

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

kyverno pwndoc
GitHub stars ★ 8.2K ★ 2.9K
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in Go JavaScript
Last push 2026-09-20 2026-09-10
Forks ⑂ 1.6K ⑂ 519
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick kyverno if

  • You weight community size — 8.2K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full kyverno profile →

pick pwndoc if

  • You want the pwndoc feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and pwndoc fits your workflow better

full pwndoc profile →

About kyverno

Kyverno is a Kubernetes native policy engine that lets platform engineering teams define security, compliance, automation, and governance rules as policy as code, using the Kubernetes tools they already run rather than a separate policy language.

read the full kyverno overview →

About pwndoc

PwnDoc is a JavaScript pentest reporting application released under the MIT license. It lives in the information security and penetration testing ecosystem, and it is positioned as a tool for audit work, vulnerability reporting, and compliance or risk management workflows. The project describes itself as a pentest report generator, with the stated aim of helping users spend more time testing and less time documenting by sharing data such as vulnerabilities among users.

read the full pwndoc overview →

More in Business Software

Plane ★ 60K Twenty ★ 57K Odoo ★ 54K Cal.com ★ 49K Rocket.Chat ★ 46K cobalt ★ 44K

Related comparisons

lighthouse vs kyverno lighthouse vs teleport lighthouse vs lynis lighthouse vs prowler lighthouse vs gs-quant lighthouse vs opa lighthouse vs amphion lighthouse vs checkov opencode vs vibe-kanban conductor vs vibe-kanban vibe-kanban vs wekan vibe-kanban vs qinglong vibe-kanban vs edict vibe-kanban vs openproject vibe-kanban vs onedev wekan vs qinglong plane vs rocket-chat plane vs cobalt plane vs buzz rocket-chat vs cobalt plane vs jitsi plane vs srs plane vs huly plane vs zulip

More Compliance & Risk Management projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Compliance & Risk Management field.

kyverno vs lighthouse kyverno vs teleport kyverno vs lynis kyverno vs prowler kyverno vs gs-quant kyverno vs opa kyverno vs Amphion kyverno vs checkov kyverno vs aircrack-ng kyverno vs tfsec kyverno vs rundeck kyverno vs agent-governance-toolkit

Frequently asked questions

Is kyverno or pwndoc more popular?

kyverno has 8,168 GitHub stars and pwndoc has 2,895. kyverno has the larger community by that measure.

Are kyverno and pwndoc free?

Both are open source. kyverno is licensed under Apache-2.0 and pwndoc under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between kyverno and pwndoc?

kyverno is written in Go and pwndoc in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, kyverno or pwndoc?

Choose kyverno if you want the larger community (8,168 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose pwndoc if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.