head to head · open source

kyverno vs rundeck

kyverno has 8,168 GitHub stars, 1,602 forks, 703 open issues and last shipped today. rundeck has 6,304 stars, 987 forks, 81 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. kyverno leads on adoption by 30% (8,168 vs 6,304 stars). kyverno is written in Go under Apache-2.0; rundeck is written in Groovy under Apache-2.0. kyverno has attracted 20% as many forks as stars, rundeck 16%. kyverno was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

kyverno ★ 8.2K rundeck ★ 6.3K category Business Software

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

kyverno rundeck
GitHub stars ★ 8.2K ★ 6.3K
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Go Groovy
Last push 2026-09-20 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 1.6K ⑂ 987
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick kyverno if

  • You weight community size — 8.2K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full kyverno profile →

pick rundeck if

  • You want the rundeck feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Groovy
  • You evaluated both and rundeck fits your workflow better

full rundeck profile →

About kyverno

Kyverno is a Kubernetes native policy engine that lets platform engineering teams define security, compliance, automation, and governance rules as policy as code, using the Kubernetes tools they already run rather than a separate policy language.

read the full kyverno overview →

About rundeck

Rundeck is an open source runbook automation service maintained by PagerDuty, distributed under the Apache License 2.0 and published from the rundeck.org homepage. It provides a web console, command line tools, and a WebAPI, and its stated purpose is to enable self service operations by giving specific users access to existing tools, services, and scripts. The repository is 16 years old and lives in the DevOps and operations tooling ecosystem, alongside topics such as ansible, automation, deployment, audit, ops, and devops tools.

read the full rundeck overview →

More in Business Software

Plane ★ 60K Twenty ★ 57K Odoo ★ 54K Cal.com ★ 49K Rocket.Chat ★ 46K cobalt ★ 44K

Related comparisons

lighthouse vs kyverno lighthouse vs teleport lighthouse vs lynis lighthouse vs prowler lighthouse vs gs-quant lighthouse vs opa lighthouse vs amphion lighthouse vs checkov opencode vs vibe-kanban conductor vs vibe-kanban vibe-kanban vs wekan vibe-kanban vs qinglong vibe-kanban vs edict vibe-kanban vs openproject vibe-kanban vs onedev wekan vs qinglong plane vs rocket-chat plane vs cobalt plane vs buzz rocket-chat vs cobalt plane vs jitsi plane vs srs plane vs huly plane vs zulip

More Compliance & Risk Management projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Compliance & Risk Management field.

kyverno vs lighthouse kyverno vs teleport kyverno vs lynis kyverno vs prowler kyverno vs gs-quant kyverno vs opa kyverno vs Amphion kyverno vs checkov kyverno vs aircrack-ng kyverno vs tfsec kyverno vs agent-governance-toolkit kyverno vs laravel-activitylog

Frequently asked questions

Is kyverno or rundeck more popular?

kyverno has 8,168 GitHub stars and rundeck has 6,304. kyverno has the larger community by that measure.

Are kyverno and rundeck free?

Both are open source. kyverno is licensed under Apache-2.0 and rundeck under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between kyverno and rundeck?

kyverno is written in Go and rundeck in Groovy. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, kyverno or rundeck?

Choose kyverno if you want the larger community (8,168 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose rundeck if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.