head to head · open source

koreader vs writing-helper

koreader has 29,761 GitHub stars, 1,908 forks, 1,345 open issues and last shipped yesterday. writing-helper has 644 stars, 112 forks, 3 open issues and last shipped 7 months ago. koreader leads on adoption by 4,521% (29,761 vs 644 stars). koreader is written in Lua under AGPL-3.0; writing-helper is written in TypeScript under MIT. koreader has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, writing-helper 17%. koreader was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

koreader ★ 30K writing-helper ★ 644 category Content & Publishing

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

koreader writing-helper
GitHub stars ★ 30K ★ 644
License AGPL-3.0 MIT
Written in Lua TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-02-06
Forks ⑂ 1.9K ⑂ 112
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick koreader if

  • You weight community size — 30K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Lua
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full koreader profile →

pick writing-helper if

  • You want the writing-helper feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and writing-helper fits your workflow better

full writing-helper profile →

About koreader

KOReader is a free, AGPL 3.0 licensed document viewer written in Lua that runs on e ink readers from Cervantes, Kindle, Kobo and PocketBook, on reMarkable, and on Android and desktop Linux, aimed at readers who want broader format support, finer typesetting control and better performance than the reading software shipped with their device.

read the full koreader overview →

About writing-helper

AI 写作助手 (AI Writing Assistant) is an open source, Next.js based writing tool that helps people organize style prompts and generate content through large language models. It is written in TypeScript under the MIT license and lives in the Node.js and Next.js ecosystem, distributed as source that runs on a local or self hosted server. The project has been public for roughly two years, holds 644 stars and 112 forks, and carries only 3 open issues at the time of writing. A hosted instance is offered at writing.chixitown.com.

read the full writing-helper overview →

More in Content & Publishing

next.js ★ 142K storybook ★ 91K hugo ★ 90K Understand-Anything ★ 83K Strapi ★ 73K nuxt ★ 61K

Related comparisons

lerna vs koreader koreader vs koodo-reader koreader vs calibre lerna vs koodo-reader lerna vs calibre lerna vs readest lerna vs ebook2audiobook lerna vs calibre-web next-js vs nuxt next-js vs gatsby next-js vs ghost next-js vs jekyll next-js vs hexo next-js vs nextra next-js vs kit next-js vs vike storybook vs understand-anything storybook vs devdocs storybook vs docsify understand-anything vs devdocs storybook vs wiki storybook vs mkdocs-material understand-anything vs docsify understand-anything vs wiki

More Publishing projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Publishing field.

koreader vs lerna koreader vs koodo-reader koreader vs calibre koreader vs readest koreader vs ebook2audiobook koreader vs calibre-web koreader vs LibreTranslate koreader vs PyMuPDF koreader vs so-novel koreader vs papermill koreader vs Calibre-Web-Automated koreader vs Weblate

Frequently asked questions

Is koreader or writing-helper more popular?

koreader has 29,761 GitHub stars and writing-helper has 644. koreader has the larger community by that measure.

Are koreader and writing-helper free?

Both are open source. koreader is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and writing-helper under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between koreader and writing-helper?

koreader is written in Lua and writing-helper in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, koreader or writing-helper?

Choose koreader if you want the larger community (29,761 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose writing-helper if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.