head to head · open source

koreader vs Calibre-Web-Automated

koreader has 30,818 GitHub stars, 2,019 forks, 1,345 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Calibre-Web-Automated has 6,537 stars, 565 forks, 443 open issues and last shipped 25 days ago. koreader leads on adoption by 371% (30,818 vs 6,537 stars). koreader is written in Lua under AGPL-3.0; Calibre-Web-Automated is written in JavaScript under GPL-3.0. koreader has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, Calibre-Web-Automated 9%. koreader was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 4 topic tags (ebook, epub, kindle, kobo), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

koreader ★ 31K Calibre-Web-Automated ★ 6.5K category Content & Publishing

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

koreader Calibre-Web-Automated
GitHub stars ★ 31K ★ 6.5K
License AGPL-3.0 GPL-3.0
Written in Lua JavaScript
Last push 2026-11-02 2026-10-09
Forks ⑂ 2.0K ⑂ 565
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick koreader if

  • You weight community size — 31K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Lua
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full koreader profile →

pick Calibre-Web-Automated if

  • You want the Calibre-Web-Automated feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and Calibre-Web-Automated fits your workflow better

full Calibre-Web-Automated profile →

About koreader

KOReader is a document viewer primarily aimed at e ink readers. [![AGPL Licence][badge license]](COPYING) [![Latest release][badge release]][link gh releases] [![Gitter][badge gitter]][link gitter] [![Mobileread][badge mobileread]][link forum] [![Build Status][badge circleci]][link circleci] [![Coverage Status][badge coverage]][link coverage] [![Weblate Status][badge weblate]][link weblate] Download • User guide • Wiki • Developer docs Main features portable : runs on embedded devices (Cervantes, Kindle, Kobo, PocketBook, reMarkable), Android and Linux computers. Developers can run a KOReader emulator in Linux…

read the full koreader overview →

About Calibre-Web-Automated

Calibre Web Automated (formerly Calibre Web Automator) Making Calibre Web your dream , all in one self hosted digital library solution. Supporting the Project ❤️ CWA is and always will be free and open source. If it makes your library life easier and you're able to support development, contributions go directly to: Testing hardware (ereader devices & tablets ect.) Development tools and infrastructure Coffee ☕ (lots of coffee) Quick Access Features 🪄 Releases 🆕 Roadmap 🛣️ How to Install: 📖 Quick Install 🚀 Docker Compose 🐋⭐(Recommended) Users Migrating from stock Calibre Web 🔄 Post Install Tasks 🏁 Default…

read the full Calibre-Web-Automated overview →

More in Content & Publishing

Related comparisons

More Publishing projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Publishing field.

Frequently asked questions

Is koreader or Calibre-Web-Automated more popular?

koreader has 30,818 GitHub stars and Calibre-Web-Automated has 6,537. koreader has the larger community by that measure.

Are koreader and Calibre-Web-Automated free?

Both are open source. koreader is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Calibre-Web-Automated under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between koreader and Calibre-Web-Automated?

koreader is written in Lua and Calibre-Web-Automated in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, koreader or Calibre-Web-Automated?

Choose koreader if you want the larger community (30,818 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Calibre-Web-Automated if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.