head to head · open source

koreader vs Weblate

koreader has 29,761 GitHub stars, 1,908 forks, 1,345 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Weblate has 6,071 stars, 1,356 forks, 493 open issues and last shipped yesterday. koreader leads on adoption by 390% (29,761 vs 6,071 stars). koreader is written in Lua under AGPL-3.0; Weblate is written in Python under GPL-3.0. koreader has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, Weblate 22%. Weblate was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

koreader ★ 30K Weblate ★ 6.1K category Content & Publishing

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

koreader Weblate
GitHub stars ★ 30K ★ 6.1K
License AGPL-3.0 GPL-3.0
Written in Lua Python
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 1.9K ⑂ 1.4K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick koreader if

  • You weight community size — 30K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Lua
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full koreader profile →

pick Weblate if

  • You want the Weblate feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and Weblate fits your workflow better

full Weblate profile →

About koreader

KOReader is a free, AGPL 3.0 licensed document viewer written in Lua that runs on e ink readers from Cervantes, Kindle, Kobo and PocketBook, on reMarkable, and on Android and desktop Linux, aimed at readers who want broader format support, finer typesetting control and better performance than the reading software shipped with their device.

read the full koreader overview →

About Weblate

Weblate is a libre, web based continuous localization system — a Python and Django application that connects translators to version control so translation happens alongside the code it belongs to, and it is used by more than 2,500 libre projects and companies in over 165 countries.

read the full Weblate overview →

More in Content & Publishing

next.js ★ 142K storybook ★ 91K hugo ★ 90K Understand-Anything ★ 83K Strapi ★ 73K nuxt ★ 61K

Related comparisons

lerna vs koreader koreader vs koodo-reader koreader vs calibre lerna vs koodo-reader lerna vs calibre lerna vs readest lerna vs ebook2audiobook lerna vs calibre-web next-js vs nuxt next-js vs gatsby next-js vs ghost next-js vs jekyll next-js vs hexo next-js vs nextra next-js vs kit next-js vs vike storybook vs understand-anything storybook vs devdocs storybook vs docsify understand-anything vs devdocs storybook vs wiki storybook vs mkdocs-material understand-anything vs docsify understand-anything vs wiki

More Publishing projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Publishing field.

koreader vs lerna koreader vs koodo-reader koreader vs calibre koreader vs readest koreader vs ebook2audiobook koreader vs calibre-web koreader vs LibreTranslate koreader vs PyMuPDF koreader vs so-novel koreader vs papermill koreader vs Calibre-Web-Automated koreader vs Lingo.dev

Frequently asked questions

Is koreader or Weblate more popular?

koreader has 29,761 GitHub stars and Weblate has 6,071. koreader has the larger community by that measure.

Are koreader and Weblate free?

Both are open source. koreader is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Weblate under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between koreader and Weblate?

koreader is written in Lua and Weblate in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, koreader or Weblate?

Choose koreader if you want the larger community (29,761 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Weblate if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.