head to head · open source

lerna vs koodo-reader

lerna has 36,053 GitHub stars, 2,265 forks, 287 open issues and last shipped yesterday. koodo-reader has 28,217 stars, 2,116 forks, 271 open issues and last shipped yesterday. lerna leads on adoption by 28% (36,053 vs 28,217 stars). lerna is written in TypeScript under MIT; koodo-reader is written in JavaScript under AGPL-3.0. lerna has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, koodo-reader 7%. lerna was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

lerna ★ 36K koodo-reader ★ 28K category Content & Publishing

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

lerna koodo-reader
GitHub stars ★ 36K ★ 28K
License MIT AGPL-3.0
Written in TypeScript JavaScript
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 2.3K ⑂ 2.1K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick lerna if

  • You weight community size — 36K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full lerna profile →

pick koodo-reader if

  • You want the koodo-reader feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and koodo-reader fits your workflow better

full koodo-reader profile →

About lerna

Lerna is a fast, modern build system for managing and publishing multiple JavaScript/TypeScript packages from the same repository, aimed at teams that maintain monorepos and publish packages to npm.

read the full lerna overview →

About koodo-reader

Koodo Reader is a cross platform ebook manager and reader written in JavaScript and released under the AGPL 3.0 license. It runs on Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, iOS, and the web, and it is distributed both as downloadable desktop and mobile applications and as a hosted web version at web.koodoreader.com. The project lives in the JavaScript ecosystem, is developed with yarn and git, and has been maintained for roughly seven years, with a repository that carries about 28,000 stars and 2,100 forks.

read the full koodo-reader overview →

More in Content & Publishing

next.js ★ 142K storybook ★ 91K hugo ★ 90K Understand-Anything ★ 83K Strapi ★ 73K nuxt ★ 61K

Related comparisons

lerna vs koreader lerna vs calibre lerna vs readest koreader vs koodo-reader lerna vs ebook2audiobook lerna vs calibre-web koreader vs calibre next-js vs nuxt next-js vs gatsby next-js vs ghost next-js vs jekyll next-js vs hexo next-js vs nextra next-js vs kit next-js vs vike storybook vs understand-anything storybook vs devdocs storybook vs docsify understand-anything vs devdocs storybook vs wiki storybook vs mkdocs-material understand-anything vs docsify understand-anything vs wiki hugo vs strapi

More Publishing projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Publishing field.

lerna vs koreader lerna vs calibre lerna vs readest lerna vs ebook2audiobook lerna vs calibre-web lerna vs LibreTranslate lerna vs PyMuPDF lerna vs so-novel lerna vs papermill lerna vs Calibre-Web-Automated lerna vs Weblate lerna vs Lingo.dev

Frequently asked questions

Is lerna or koodo-reader more popular?

lerna has 36,053 GitHub stars and koodo-reader has 28,217. lerna has the larger community by that measure.

Are lerna and koodo-reader free?

Both are open source. lerna is licensed under MIT and koodo-reader under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between lerna and koodo-reader?

lerna is written in TypeScript and koodo-reader in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, lerna or koodo-reader?

Choose lerna if you want the larger community (36,053 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose koodo-reader if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.