head to head · open source
lerna vs LibreTranslate
lerna has 36,053 GitHub stars, 2,265 forks, 287 open issues and last shipped yesterday. LibreTranslate has 16,640 stars, 1,705 forks, 126 open issues and last shipped 15 days ago. lerna leads on adoption by 117% (36,053 vs 16,640 stars). lerna is written in TypeScript under MIT; LibreTranslate is written in Python under AGPL-3.0. lerna has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, LibreTranslate 10%. lerna was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| lerna | LibreTranslate | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 36K | ★ 17K |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Written in | TypeScript | Python |
| Last push | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-03 |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.3K | ⑂ 1.7K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick lerna if
- You weight community size — 36K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick LibreTranslate if
- You want the LibreTranslate feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and LibreTranslate fits your workflow better
About lerna
Lerna is a fast, modern build system for managing and publishing multiple JavaScript/TypeScript packages from the same repository, aimed at teams that maintain monorepos and publish packages to npm.
read the full lerna overview →
About LibreTranslate
LibreTranslate is a free and open source machine translation API written in Python and released under the AGPL 3.0 license. It lives in the open source translation ecosystem and is positioned as a self hosted alternative to hosted translation services. The project does not rely on proprietary software such as Google or Azure for translation. Instead, it uses the open source Argos Translate library as its translation engine.
read the full LibreTranslate overview →
More in Content & Publishing
Related comparisons
More Publishing projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Publishing field.
Frequently asked questions
Is lerna or LibreTranslate more popular?
lerna has 36,053 GitHub stars and LibreTranslate has 16,640. lerna has the larger community by that measure.
Are lerna and LibreTranslate free?
Both are open source. lerna is licensed under MIT and LibreTranslate under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between lerna and LibreTranslate?
lerna is written in TypeScript and LibreTranslate in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, lerna or LibreTranslate?
Choose lerna if you want the larger community (36,053 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose LibreTranslate if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.