head to head · open source

lerna vs Weblate

lerna has 36,053 GitHub stars, 2,265 forks, 287 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Weblate has 6,071 stars, 1,356 forks, 493 open issues and last shipped yesterday. lerna leads on adoption by 494% (36,053 vs 6,071 stars). lerna is written in TypeScript under MIT; Weblate is written in Python under GPL-3.0. lerna has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, Weblate 22%. Weblate was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

lerna ★ 36K Weblate ★ 6.1K category Content & Publishing

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

lerna Weblate
GitHub stars ★ 36K ★ 6.1K
License MIT GPL-3.0
Written in TypeScript Python
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 2.3K ⑂ 1.4K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick lerna if

  • You weight community size — 36K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full lerna profile →

pick Weblate if

  • You want the Weblate feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and Weblate fits your workflow better

full Weblate profile →

About lerna

Lerna is a fast, modern build system for managing and publishing multiple JavaScript/TypeScript packages from the same repository, aimed at teams that maintain monorepos and publish packages to npm.

read the full lerna overview →

About Weblate

Weblate is a libre, web based continuous localization system — a Python and Django application that connects translators to version control so translation happens alongside the code it belongs to, and it is used by more than 2,500 libre projects and companies in over 165 countries.

read the full Weblate overview →

More in Content & Publishing

next.js ★ 142K storybook ★ 91K hugo ★ 90K Understand-Anything ★ 83K Strapi ★ 73K nuxt ★ 61K

Related comparisons

lerna vs koreader lerna vs koodo-reader lerna vs calibre lerna vs readest lerna vs ebook2audiobook lerna vs calibre-web koreader vs koodo-reader koreader vs calibre next-js vs nuxt next-js vs gatsby next-js vs ghost next-js vs jekyll next-js vs hexo next-js vs nextra next-js vs kit next-js vs vike storybook vs understand-anything storybook vs devdocs storybook vs docsify understand-anything vs devdocs storybook vs wiki storybook vs mkdocs-material understand-anything vs docsify understand-anything vs wiki

More Publishing projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Publishing field.

lerna vs koreader lerna vs koodo-reader lerna vs calibre lerna vs readest lerna vs ebook2audiobook lerna vs calibre-web lerna vs LibreTranslate lerna vs PyMuPDF lerna vs so-novel lerna vs papermill lerna vs Calibre-Web-Automated lerna vs Lingo.dev

Frequently asked questions

Is lerna or Weblate more popular?

lerna has 36,053 GitHub stars and Weblate has 6,071. lerna has the larger community by that measure.

Are lerna and Weblate free?

Both are open source. lerna is licensed under MIT and Weblate under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between lerna and Weblate?

lerna is written in TypeScript and Weblate in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, lerna or Weblate?

Choose lerna if you want the larger community (36,053 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Weblate if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.