head to head · open source

koodo-reader vs 101-linux-commands

koodo-reader has 28,699 GitHub stars, 2,148 forks, 271 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. 101-linux-commands has 1,192 stars, 151 forks, 3 open issues and last shipped 7 months ago. koodo-reader leads on adoption by 2,308% (28,699 vs 1,192 stars). koodo-reader is written in JavaScript under AGPL-3.0; 101-linux-commands is written in HTML under MIT. koodo-reader has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, 101-linux-commands 13%. koodo-reader was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (ebook), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

koodo-reader ★ 29K 101-linux-commands ★ 1.2K category Content & Publishing

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

koodo-reader 101-linux-commands
GitHub stars ★ 29K ★ 1.2K
License AGPL-3.0 MIT
Written in JavaScript HTML
Last push 2026-11-01 2026-03-24
Forks ⑂ 2.1K ⑂ 151
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick koodo-reader if

  • You weight community size — 29K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full koodo-reader profile →

pick 101-linux-commands if

  • You want the 101-linux-commands feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches HTML
  • You evaluated both and 101-linux-commands fits your workflow better

full 101-linux-commands profile →

About koodo-reader

简体中文 हिंदी Português Indonesian English Türkçe Koodo Reader A cross platform ebook reader Download Preview Roadmap Document Plugins Preview Features Format support: EPUB ( .epub ) PDF ( .pdf ) DRM free Mobipocket ( .mobi ) and Kindle ( .azw3 , .azw ) Plain text ( .txt ) FictionBook ( .fb2 ) Comic book archive ( .cbr , .cbz , .cbt , .cb7 ) Rich text ( .md , .docx ) HyperText ( .html , .xml , .xhtml , .mhtml , .htm ) Platform support: Windows , macOS , Linux , Android , iOS and Web Sync and backup your data with OneDrive , Google Drive , Dropbox , iCloud , MEGA , pCloud , Yandex Disk , Box , FTP , SFTP , WebDAV…

read the full koodo-reader overview →

About 101-linux-commands

💻 ++101 Linux commands Open source eBook This is an open source eBook with 101 Linux commands that everyone should know. No matter if you are a DevOps/SysOps engineer, developer, or just a Linux enthusiast, you will most likely have to use the terminal at some point in your career. Make sure to star the repository ⭐ If you need a Linux virtual machine to test these commands on, use the following referral link to get a free $200 Credit For DigitalOcean! Introduction to Linux eBook If you are looking for a comprehensive guide for beginners, check out this eBook: Introduction to Linux eBook 📙 Online eBook An…

read the full 101-linux-commands overview →

More in Content & Publishing

Related comparisons

More Publishing projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Publishing field.

Frequently asked questions

Is koodo-reader or 101-linux-commands more popular?

koodo-reader has 28,699 GitHub stars and 101-linux-commands has 1,192. koodo-reader has the larger community by that measure.

Are koodo-reader and 101-linux-commands free?

Both are open source. koodo-reader is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and 101-linux-commands under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between koodo-reader and 101-linux-commands?

koodo-reader is written in JavaScript and 101-linux-commands in HTML. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, koodo-reader or 101-linux-commands?

Choose koodo-reader if you want the larger community (28,699 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose 101-linux-commands if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.