head to head · open source

Supabase vs KeystoneJS

Supabase has 110,361 GitHub stars, 14,414 forks, 1,128 open issues and last shipped today. KeystoneJS has 9,976 stars, 1,265 forks, 138 open issues and last shipped 6 days ago. Supabase leads on adoption by 1,006% (110,361 vs 9,976 stars). Supabase is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0; KeystoneJS is written in TypeScript under MIT. Supabase has attracted 13% as many forks as stars, KeystoneJS 13%. Supabase was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Supabase ★ 110K KeystoneJS ★ 10.0K category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Supabase KeystoneJS
GitHub stars ★ 110K ★ 10.0K
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-20 2026-09-14
Forks ⑂ 14K ⑂ 1.3K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Supabase if

  • You weight community size — 110K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Supabase profile →

pick KeystoneJS if

  • You want the KeystoneJS feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and KeystoneJS fits your workflow better

full KeystoneJS profile →

About Supabase

Supabase is an open source, Apache 2.0 licensed Postgres development platform that bundles a dedicated Postgres database with authentication, auto generated APIs, realtime subscriptions, file storage, and edge functions for developers building web, mobile, and AI applications.

read the full Supabase overview →

About KeystoneJS

KeystoneJS is an open source Node.js CMS and application framework written in TypeScript and licensed under the MIT License. It lives in the Node.js, GraphQL, and React ecosystem, and its GitHub description calls it a headless CMS for Node.js. The project addresses the need to build a custom back end without writing all of the common content management plumbing by hand.

read the full KeystoneJS overview →

More in Developer Tools

ECC ★ 263K react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 209K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K pi ★ 107K

Related comparisons

ecc vs supabase react vs supabase supabase vs appwrite openclaw vs langflow ecc vs react ecc vs langflow react vs langflow n8n vs langflow ecc vs puppeteer openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip react vs vscode react vs neovim react vs zed opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed vscode vs neovim vscode vs zed

More Frameworks & Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Frameworks & Platforms field.

Supabase vs ECC Supabase vs react Supabase vs Langflow Supabase vs puppeteer Supabase vs archify Supabase vs PocketBase Supabase vs i-have-adhd Supabase vs codebase-memory-mcp Supabase vs ToolJet Supabase vs AppSmith Supabase vs it-tools Supabase vs herdr

Frequently asked questions

Is Supabase or KeystoneJS more popular?

Supabase has 110,361 GitHub stars and KeystoneJS has 9,976. Supabase has the larger community by that measure.

Are Supabase and KeystoneJS free?

Both are open source. Supabase is licensed under Apache-2.0 and KeystoneJS under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Supabase and KeystoneJS?

Supabase is written in TypeScript and KeystoneJS in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Supabase or KeystoneJS?

Choose Supabase if you want the larger community (110,361 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose KeystoneJS if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.