head to head · open source
archify vs KeystoneJS
archify has 67,632 GitHub stars, 4,517 forks, 134 open issues and last shipped today. KeystoneJS has 9,976 stars, 1,265 forks, 138 open issues and last shipped 6 days ago. archify leads on adoption by 578% (67,632 vs 9,976 stars). archify is written in JavaScript under MIT; KeystoneJS is written in TypeScript under MIT. archify has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, KeystoneJS 13%. archify was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| archify | KeystoneJS | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 68K | ★ 10.0K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | JavaScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-09-20 | 2026-09-14 |
| Forks | ⑂ 4.5K | ⑂ 1.3K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick archify if
- You weight community size — 68K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick KeystoneJS if
- You want the KeystoneJS feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and KeystoneJS fits your workflow better
About archify
Archify is an MIT licensed agent skill and Node.js rendering and validation system that turns a codebase or a written system description into a polished, interactive, self contained HTML system map, and it is built for developers and platform teams working inside coding agents such as Cursor, Claude Code, Codex CLI, and OpenCode.
read the full archify overview →
About KeystoneJS
KeystoneJS is an open source Node.js CMS and application framework written in TypeScript and licensed under the MIT License. It lives in the Node.js, GraphQL, and React ecosystem, and its GitHub description calls it a headless CMS for Node.js. The project addresses the need to build a custom back end without writing all of the common content management plumbing by hand.
read the full KeystoneJS overview →
More in Developer Tools
Related comparisons
More Frameworks & Platforms projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Frameworks & Platforms field.
Frequently asked questions
Is archify or KeystoneJS more popular?
archify has 67,632 GitHub stars and KeystoneJS has 9,976. archify has the larger community by that measure.
Are archify and KeystoneJS free?
Both are open source. archify is licensed under MIT and KeystoneJS under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between archify and KeystoneJS?
archify is written in JavaScript and KeystoneJS in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, archify or KeystoneJS?
Choose archify if you want the larger community (67,632 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose KeystoneJS if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.