head to head · open source

Karakeep vs Readeck

Karakeep has 29,110 GitHub stars, 1,516 forks, 726 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Readeck has 275 stars, 0 forks, 2 open issues and last shipped 2.8 years ago. Karakeep leads on adoption by 10,485% (29,110 vs 275 stars). Karakeep is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; Readeck is written in various languages under a licence not recorded in this registry. Karakeep has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, Readeck 0%. Karakeep was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Karakeep ★ 29K Readeck ★ 275 category Productivity & Utilities

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Karakeep Readeck
GitHub stars ★ 29K ★ 275
License AGPL-3.0 Custom / other
Written in TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-16 2023-12-18
Forks ⑂ 1.5K ⑂ 0
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Karakeep if

  • You weight community size — 29K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Karakeep profile →

pick Readeck if

  • You want the Readeck feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You evaluated both and Readeck fits your workflow better

full Readeck profile →

About Karakeep

Karakeep is a self hostable bookmark and content management application designed for users who collect links, notes, images, and PDFs across devices. It originated as Hoarder and evolved into a full featured tool for personal knowledge management, with strong emphasis on AI assisted organization and long term content preservation. Built with Next.js, it runs in the web browser and mobile apps, supporting both local and cloud hosted AI models.

read the full Karakeep overview →

About Readeck

Readeck is a tool for saving, organizing and revisiting web content, aimed at people who want to keep the pages they read and come back to them later.

read the full Readeck overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K Browser Use ★ 115K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K

Related comparisons

karakeep vs linkwarden karakeep vs wallabag karakeep vs linkding karakeep vs ryot karakeep vs seriesguide karakeep vs showly linkwarden vs wallabag linkwarden vs linkding n8n vs browser-use n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces n8n vs skyvern n8n vs automa n8n vs livekit n8n vs obs-studio n8n vs sharex n8n vs kap excalidraw vs obs-studio n8n vs snapify excalidraw vs sharex excalidraw vs kap excalidraw vs snapify

More Bookmark & Content Management projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Bookmark & Content Management field.

Karakeep vs Linkwarden Karakeep vs Wallabag Karakeep vs Linkding Karakeep vs Ryot Karakeep vs SeriesGuide Karakeep vs Showly Karakeep vs Faved Karakeep vs Tonkatsu Box Karakeep vs Bookmark It Karakeep vs Brace.to Karakeep vs Cloudmark Karakeep vs Capd

Frequently asked questions

Is Karakeep or Readeck more popular?

Karakeep has 29,110 GitHub stars and Readeck has 275. Karakeep has the larger community by that measure.

Are Karakeep and Readeck free?

Both are open source. Karakeep is licensed under AGPL-3.0, and Readeck has no licence declared in this registry. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between Karakeep and Readeck?

Karakeep is written in TypeScript and Readeck in various languages. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Karakeep or Readeck?

Choose Karakeep if you want the larger community (29,110 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Readeck if its feature set, stack or Custom / other licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.