head to head · open source
Kaneo vs paca
Kaneo has 9,708 GitHub stars, 930 forks, 70 open issues and last shipped yesterday. paca has 2,024 stars, 185 forks, 8 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Kaneo leads on adoption by 380% (9,708 vs 2,024 stars). Kaneo is written in TypeScript under MIT; paca is written in Go under Apache-2.0. Kaneo has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, paca 9%. paca was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 4 topic tags (jira-alternative, mcp, project-management, self-hosted), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Kaneo | paca | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 9.7K | ★ 2.0K |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | TypeScript | Go |
| Last push | 2026-11-04 | 2026-11-04 |
| Forks | ⑂ 930 | ⑂ 185 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Kaneo if
- You weight community size — 9.7K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick paca if
- You want the paca feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and paca fits your workflow better
About Kaneo
Quick Start Website Cloud Discord Why Kaneo? After years of using bloated, overcomplicated project management platforms that distracted from actual work, we built Kaneo to be different. The problem with most tools isn't that they lack features, it's that they have too many . Every notification, every unnecessary button, every complex workflow pulls your team away from what matters: building great products . We believe the best tools are invisible . They should amplify your team's natural workflow, not force you to adapt to theirs. Kaneo is built on the principle that less is more : every feature exists because…
read the full Kaneo overview →
About paca
Paca AI native. Free. Lightweight. Open source. The fully customizable alternative to Jira, Trello, ClickUp, and Monday. ✨ Sponsored by Getting Started · MCP Server · Paca Skills · Architecture · Contributing · Roadmap What is Paca? Paca is a self hosted project management platform where AI agents and humans collaborate as equal teammates inside a Scrum team — not as chatbots bolted on the side. Jira gives you a backlog. ClickUp gives you automations. Monday gives you dashboards. Paca gives your AI agents a seat at the table. They join sprint planning, pick up tasks from the board, write BDD specs, and adapt…
More in Business Software
Related comparisons
More Project & Work Management projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Project & Work Management field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Kaneo or paca more popular?
Kaneo has 9,708 GitHub stars and paca has 2,024. Kaneo has the larger community by that measure.
Are Kaneo and paca free?
Both are open source. Kaneo is licensed under MIT and paca under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Kaneo and paca?
Kaneo is written in TypeScript and paca in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Kaneo or paca?
Choose Kaneo if you want the larger community (9,708 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose paca if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.