head to head · open source

Joplin vs Zen

Joplin has 56,416 GitHub stars, 6,296 forks, 632 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Zen has 1,174 stars, 61 forks, 1 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. Joplin leads on adoption by 4,705% (56,416 vs 1,174 stars). Joplin is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; Zen is written in JavaScript under AGPL-3.0. Joplin has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, Zen 5%. Joplin was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Joplin ★ 56K Zen ★ 1.2K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Joplin Zen
GitHub stars ★ 56K ★ 1.2K
License Custom / other AGPL-3.0
Written in TypeScript JavaScript
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-13
Forks ⑂ 6.3K ⑂ 61
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Joplin if

  • You weight community size — 56K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Joplin profile →

pick Zen if

  • You want the Zen feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and Zen fits your workflow better

full Zen profile →

About Joplin

Joplin is a free, open source, privacy focused note taking and to do application that keeps notes as Markdown on your own device and synchronises them, end to end encrypted, across Windows, macOS, Linux, Android and iOS.

read the full Joplin overview →

About Zen

Zen is a self hosted note taking application that ships as a single Go binary or as a Docker Compose stack. Notes are written and stored as standard Markdown, with the content and its metadata kept in a local SQLite database. The project sits in the self hosted productivity and knowledge management ecosystem, alongside other personal note servers, and it presents itself as clean, distraction free, and lightweight by design.

read the full Zen overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K Browser Use ★ 115K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K

Related comparisons

appflowy vs joplin memos vs joplin appflowy vs memos appflowy vs siyuan appflowy vs logseq appflowy vs outline appflowy vs open-notebook appflowy vs khoj n8n vs browser-use n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces n8n vs skyvern n8n vs automa n8n vs livekit n8n vs obs-studio n8n vs sharex n8n vs kap excalidraw vs obs-studio n8n vs snapify excalidraw vs sharex excalidraw vs kap excalidraw vs snapify

More Note Taking & Knowledge Management projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Note Taking & Knowledge Management field.

Joplin vs AppFlowy Joplin vs Memos Joplin vs SiYuan Joplin vs Logseq Joplin vs Outline Joplin vs Open-Notebook Joplin vs Khoj Joplin vs Docmost Joplin vs Tolaria Joplin vs SurfSense Joplin vs Zotero Joplin vs Notesnook

Frequently asked questions

Is Joplin or Zen more popular?

Joplin has 56,416 GitHub stars and Zen has 1,174. Joplin has the larger community by that measure.

Are Joplin and Zen free?

Both are open source. Joplin has no licence declared in this registry, and Zen is licensed under AGPL-3.0. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between Joplin and Zen?

Joplin is written in TypeScript and Zen in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Joplin or Zen?

Choose Joplin if you want the larger community (56,416 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose Zen if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.