head to head · open source

Joplin vs nocturne_memory

Joplin has 56,429 GitHub stars, 6,297 forks, 632 open issues and last shipped yesterday. nocturne_memory has 1,359 stars, 168 forks, 6 open issues and last shipped 23 days ago. Joplin leads on adoption by 4,052% (56,429 vs 1,359 stars). Joplin is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; nocturne_memory is written in Python under MIT. Joplin has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, nocturne_memory 12%. Joplin was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Joplin ★ 56K nocturne_memory ★ 1.4K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

Joplin nocturne_memory
GitHub stars ★ 56K ★ 1.4K
License Custom / other MIT
Written in TypeScript Python
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-08-27
Forks ⑂ 6.3K ⑂ 168
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Joplin if

  • You weight community size — 56K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Joplin profile →

pick nocturne_memory if

  • You want the nocturne_memory feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and nocturne_memory fits your workflow better

full nocturne_memory profile →

About Joplin

Joplin is a free, open source, privacy focused note taking and to do application that keeps notes as Markdown on your own device and synchronises them, end to end encrypted, across Windows, macOS, Linux, Android and iOS.

read the full Joplin overview →

About nocturne_memory

Nocturne Memory is an MIT licensed, Python based Long Term Memory Server that speaks the Model Context Protocol, giving MCP capable agents persistent, structured, rollbackable memory across sessions, models and tools — built for anyone running Claude Code, Cursor, Gemini CLI, Codex or another MCP client who is tired of an agent that forgets who it is.

read the full nocturne_memory overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K Browser Use ★ 115K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K

Related comparisons

appflowy vs joplin openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane mem0 vs memos n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces n8n vs obs-studio n8n vs sharex n8n vs kap excalidraw vs obs-studio n8n vs snapify excalidraw vs sharex excalidraw vs kap excalidraw vs snapify

More Note Taking & Knowledge Management projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Note Taking & Knowledge Management field.

Joplin vs AppFlowy Joplin vs Memos Joplin vs SiYuan Joplin vs Logseq Joplin vs Outline Joplin vs Open-Notebook Joplin vs Khoj Joplin vs Docmost Joplin vs Tolaria Joplin vs SurfSense Joplin vs Zotero Joplin vs Notesnook

Frequently asked questions

Is Joplin or nocturne_memory more popular?

Joplin has 56,429 GitHub stars and nocturne_memory has 1,359. Joplin has the larger community by that measure.

Are Joplin and nocturne_memory free?

Both are open source. Joplin has no licence declared in this registry, and nocturne_memory is licensed under MIT. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between Joplin and nocturne_memory?

Joplin is written in TypeScript and nocturne_memory in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Joplin or nocturne_memory?

Choose Joplin if you want the larger community (56,429 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose nocturne_memory if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.