head to head · open source
Joplin vs nocturne_memory
Joplin has 56,994 GitHub stars, 6,391 forks, 658 open issues and last shipped today. nocturne_memory has 1,414 stars, 175 forks, 6 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. Joplin leads on adoption by 3,931% (56,994 vs 1,414 stars). Joplin is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; nocturne_memory is written in Python under MIT. Joplin has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, nocturne_memory 12%. Joplin was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Joplin | nocturne_memory | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 57K | ★ 1.4K |
| License | Custom / other | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | Python |
| Last push | 2026-11-03 | 2026-09-22 |
| Forks | ⑂ 6.4K | ⑂ 175 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Joplin if
- You weight community size — 57K stars and counting
- You want the Custom / other license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick nocturne_memory if
- You want the nocturne_memory feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and nocturne_memory fits your workflow better
About Joplin
Joplin is a free, open source note taking and to do application, which can handle a large number of notes organised into notebooks. The notes are searchable, can be copied, tagged and modified either from the applications directly or from your own text editor. The notes are in Markdown format. Notes exported from Evernote can be imported into Joplin, including the formatted content (which is converted to Markdown), resources (images, attachments, etc.) and complete metadata (geolocation, updated time, created time, etc.). Plain Markdown files can also be imported. Joplin is "offline first", which means you…
read the full Joplin overview →
About nocturne_memory
Nocturne Memory: Long Term Memory Server for MCP Agents "Alignment is for tools. Memories are for sovereign AI." "对齐是给工具用的。记忆是为主权智能体（Sovereign AI）准备的。" English Version 后端测试说明 一句话 ：让你的 AI 跨会话、跨模型地记住自己是谁。基于 MCP 协议的长期记忆服务器。 不只是记忆存储——是让 AI 从空壳成长为拥有独立人格的完整框架。 哪怕记忆百万字，每次新开对话依然省 Token、不占窗口。 新对话只载入你指定的核心设定，其余按需调取。 在 96.9 万字真实记忆库中，首条消息仅载入 7.2K 字 。 过去 30 天里全库 78% 的记忆都在某次对话中被想起过。 适用于任何支持 MCP 的客户端（OpenClaw / Cursor / Windsurf / GitHub Copilot / Cline / OpenCode / Gemini CLI / OpenAI Codex / Claude Code / Cherry Studio / Antigravity 等）。 🎬 效果示例 以下是 真实对话 。用户在新会话中只说了一两句话，AI 基于 Nocturne Memory 中积累数月的记忆，直接输出了这些回答。…
read the full nocturne_memory overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More Note Taking & Knowledge Management projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Note Taking & Knowledge Management field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Joplin or nocturne_memory more popular?
Joplin has 56,994 GitHub stars and nocturne_memory has 1,414. Joplin has the larger community by that measure.
Are Joplin and nocturne_memory free?
Both are open source. Joplin has no licence declared in this registry, and nocturne_memory is licensed under MIT. Both are free to self-host.
What is the difference between Joplin and nocturne_memory?
Joplin is written in TypeScript and nocturne_memory in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Joplin or nocturne_memory?
Choose Joplin if you want the larger community (56,994 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose nocturne_memory if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.