head to head · open source

Joplin vs Beaver Notes

Joplin has 56,416 GitHub stars, 6,296 forks, 632 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Beaver Notes has 1,344 stars, 65 forks, 18 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. Joplin leads on adoption by 4,098% (56,416 vs 1,344 stars). Joplin is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; Beaver Notes is written in JavaScript under MIT. Joplin has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, Beaver Notes 5%. Joplin was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Joplin ★ 56K Beaver Notes ★ 1.3K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Joplin Beaver Notes
GitHub stars ★ 56K ★ 1.3K
License Custom / other MIT
Written in TypeScript JavaScript
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-14
Forks ⑂ 6.3K ⑂ 65
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Joplin if

  • You weight community size — 56K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Joplin profile →

pick Beaver Notes if

  • You want the Beaver Notes feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and Beaver Notes fits your workflow better

full Beaver Notes profile →

About Joplin

Joplin is a free, open source, privacy focused note taking and to do application that keeps notes as Markdown on your own device and synchronises them, end to end encrypted, across Windows, macOS, Linux, Android and iOS.

read the full Joplin overview →

About Beaver Notes

Beaver Notes is an open source, local first workspace for notes, projects, and meetings. It is a JavaScript application under the MIT license, and it presents itself as a privacy focused note taking tool. The core idea is that notes stay on the user's device unless the user explicitly chooses a sync method.

read the full Beaver Notes overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K Browser Use ★ 115K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K

Related comparisons

appflowy vs joplin memos vs joplin appflowy vs memos appflowy vs siyuan appflowy vs logseq appflowy vs outline appflowy vs open-notebook appflowy vs khoj n8n vs browser-use n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces n8n vs skyvern n8n vs automa n8n vs livekit n8n vs obs-studio n8n vs sharex n8n vs kap excalidraw vs obs-studio n8n vs snapify excalidraw vs sharex excalidraw vs kap excalidraw vs snapify

More Note Taking & Knowledge Management projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Note Taking & Knowledge Management field.

Joplin vs AppFlowy Joplin vs Memos Joplin vs SiYuan Joplin vs Logseq Joplin vs Outline Joplin vs Open-Notebook Joplin vs Khoj Joplin vs Docmost Joplin vs Tolaria Joplin vs SurfSense Joplin vs Zotero Joplin vs Notesnook

Frequently asked questions

Is Joplin or Beaver Notes more popular?

Joplin has 56,416 GitHub stars and Beaver Notes has 1,344. Joplin has the larger community by that measure.

Are Joplin and Beaver Notes free?

Both are open source. Joplin has no licence declared in this registry, and Beaver Notes is licensed under MIT. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between Joplin and Beaver Notes?

Joplin is written in TypeScript and Beaver Notes in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Joplin or Beaver Notes?

Choose Joplin if you want the larger community (56,416 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose Beaver Notes if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.