head to head · open source

Jitsi vs DesktopEditors

Jitsi has 29,931 GitHub stars, 8,026 forks, 141 open issues and last shipped yesterday. DesktopEditors has 5,401 stars, 541 forks, 465 open issues and last shipped 4 months ago. Jitsi leads on adoption by 454% (29,931 vs 5,401 stars). Jitsi is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0; DesktopEditors is written in various languages under AGPL-3.0. Jitsi has attracted 27% as many forks as stars, DesktopEditors 10%. Jitsi was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Jitsi ★ 30K DesktopEditors ★ 5.4K category Business Software

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Jitsi DesktopEditors
GitHub stars ★ 30K ★ 5.4K
License Apache-2.0 AGPL-3.0
Written in TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-05-21
Forks ⑂ 8.0K ⑂ 541
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Jitsi if

  • You weight community size — 30K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Jitsi profile →

pick DesktopEditors if

  • You want the DesktopEditors feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • You evaluated both and DesktopEditors fits your workflow better

full DesktopEditors profile →

About Jitsi

Jitsi Meet is an open source video conferencing platform built on WebRTC standards, designed for privacy focused, account free video calls. It operates as a standalone web application or embeddable component, supporting both browser based and native mobile usage without requiring user accounts to join meetings. The project lives in the video communication ecosystem, competing directly with proprietary services like Zoom, Google Meet, and Slack’s built in calling.

read the full Jitsi overview →

About DesktopEditors

ONLYOFFICE Desktop Editors is a free, open source office suite that combines document, spreadsheet, presentation, PDF, and PDF form editors with a diagram viewer into one offline desktop application for Windows, Linux, and macOS, aimed at anyone who works with Office Open XML files and wants a local, no internet alternative to a proprietary office suite.

read the full DesktopEditors overview →

More in Business Software

Plane ★ 60K Twenty ★ 57K Odoo ★ 54K Cal.com ★ 49K Rocket.Chat ★ 46K cobalt ★ 43K

Related comparisons

plane vs jitsi plane vs rocket-chat plane vs cobalt plane vs buzz rocket-chat vs cobalt plane vs srs plane vs huly plane vs zulip plane vs anki twenty vs anki odoo vs anki cal-com vs anki plane vs tutor twenty vs tutor odoo vs tutor cal-com vs tutor plane vs hrms plane vs ever-gauzy twenty vs hrms twenty vs ever-gauzy odoo vs hrms odoo vs ever-gauzy plane vs horilla twenty vs horilla

More Collaboration & Communication projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Collaboration & Communication field.

Jitsi vs Plane Jitsi vs Rocket.Chat Jitsi vs cobalt Jitsi vs Buzz Jitsi vs srs Jitsi vs Huly Jitsi vs Zulip Jitsi vs etherpad Jitsi vs drawnix Jitsi vs univer Jitsi vs chat Jitsi vs bigbluebutton

Frequently asked questions

Is Jitsi or DesktopEditors more popular?

Jitsi has 29,931 GitHub stars and DesktopEditors has 5,401. Jitsi has the larger community by that measure.

Are Jitsi and DesktopEditors free?

Both are open source. Jitsi is licensed under Apache-2.0 and DesktopEditors under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Jitsi and DesktopEditors?

Jitsi is written in TypeScript and DesktopEditors in various languages. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Jitsi or DesktopEditors?

Choose Jitsi if you want the larger community (29,931 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose DesktopEditors if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.