head to head · open source

i-have-adhd vs Acode

i-have-adhd has 48,794 GitHub stars, 2,838 forks, 73 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Acode has 7,050 stars, 1,571 forks, 94 open issues and last shipped yesterday. i-have-adhd leads on adoption by 592% (48,794 vs 7,050 stars). i-have-adhd is written in Python under MIT; Acode is written in JavaScript under MIT. i-have-adhd has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, Acode 22%. Acode was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

i-have-adhd ★ 49K Acode ★ 7.0K category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

i-have-adhd Acode
GitHub stars ★ 49K ★ 7.0K
License MIT MIT
Written in Python JavaScript
Last push 2026-09-19 2026-09-19
Forks ⑂ 2.8K ⑂ 1.6K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick i-have-adhd if

  • You weight community size — 49K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full i-have-adhd profile →

pick Acode if

  • You want the Acode feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and Acode fits your workflow better

full Acode profile →

About i-have-adhd

i have adhd is a skill for coding agents, distributed as a Claude Code plugin, that stops the assistant from burying the answer inside preamble, recap, and closers.

read the full i-have-adhd overview →

About Acode

Acode is a free, MIT licensed code editor for Android, distributed by the Acode Foundation under the package name com.foxdebug.acodefree on Google Play and com.foxdebug.acode on F Droid, and it is aimed at developers who want to read, edit, and preview source files directly on an Android phone or tablet.

read the full Acode overview →

More in Developer Tools

ECC ★ 263K react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 209K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs langflow ecc vs react ecc vs langflow react vs langflow ecc vs supabase react vs supabase n8n vs langflow ecc vs puppeteer openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip react vs vscode react vs neovim react vs zed opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed vscode vs neovim vscode vs zed react vs kilocode

More Frameworks & Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Frameworks & Platforms field.

i-have-adhd vs ECC i-have-adhd vs react i-have-adhd vs Langflow i-have-adhd vs Supabase i-have-adhd vs puppeteer i-have-adhd vs archify i-have-adhd vs PocketBase i-have-adhd vs codebase-memory-mcp i-have-adhd vs ToolJet i-have-adhd vs AppSmith i-have-adhd vs it-tools i-have-adhd vs herdr

Frequently asked questions

Is i-have-adhd or Acode more popular?

i-have-adhd has 48,794 GitHub stars and Acode has 7,050. i-have-adhd has the larger community by that measure.

Are i-have-adhd and Acode free?

Both are open source. i-have-adhd is licensed under MIT and Acode under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between i-have-adhd and Acode?

i-have-adhd is written in Python and Acode in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, i-have-adhd or Acode?

Choose i-have-adhd if you want the larger community (48,794 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Acode if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.