head to head · open source
Huly vs mirotalksfu
Huly has 27,700 GitHub stars, 2,155 forks, 849 open issues and last shipped yesterday. mirotalksfu has 3,103 stars, 500 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Huly leads on adoption by 793% (27,700 vs 3,103 stars). Huly is written in TypeScript under EPL-2.0; mirotalksfu is written in JavaScript under AGPL-3.0. Huly has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, mirotalksfu 16%. mirotalksfu was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Huly | mirotalksfu | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 28K | ★ 3.1K |
| License | EPL-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Written in | TypeScript | JavaScript |
| Last push | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-17 |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.2K | ⑂ 500 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Huly if
- You weight community size — 28K stars and counting
- You want the EPL-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick mirotalksfu if
- You want the mirotalksfu feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You evaluated both and mirotalksfu fits your workflow better
About Huly
Huly is an open source, EPL 2.0 licensed, TypeScript built all in one work platform that folds project management, issue tracking, chat, CRM, HRM and applicant tracking into one system teams can run on their own servers, aimed at organisations that want the ground Jira, Linear, ClickUp, Slack and Notion cover without renting it from five separate vendors.
About mirotalksfu
MiroTalk SFU is a self hosted, open source WebRTC video conferencing platform written in JavaScript and built on the Mediasoup selective forwarding unit architecture. It provides real time communication and collaboration features for rooms, screen sharing, chat, file sharing, live streaming, and recording, while allowing organizations to run the service on their own server. The project positions itself as an alternative to Zoom, Google Meet, Jitsi Meet, and Microsoft Teams.
read the full mirotalksfu overview →
More in Business Software
Related comparisons
More Collaboration & Communication projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Collaboration & Communication field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Huly or mirotalksfu more popular?
Huly has 27,700 GitHub stars and mirotalksfu has 3,103. Huly has the larger community by that measure.
Are Huly and mirotalksfu free?
Both are open source. Huly is licensed under EPL-2.0 and mirotalksfu under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Huly and mirotalksfu?
Huly is written in TypeScript and mirotalksfu in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Huly or mirotalksfu?
Choose Huly if you want the larger community (27,700 stars) or its EPL-2.0 licence terms. Choose mirotalksfu if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.