head to head · open source

Huly vs etherpad

Huly has 27,700 GitHub stars, 2,155 forks, 849 open issues and last shipped yesterday. etherpad has 18,552 stars, 3,050 forks, 31 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Huly leads on adoption by 49% (27,700 vs 18,552 stars). Huly is written in TypeScript under EPL-2.0; etherpad is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0. Huly has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, etherpad 16%. etherpad was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Huly ★ 28K etherpad ★ 19K category Business Software

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Huly etherpad
GitHub stars ★ 28K ★ 19K
License EPL-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 2.2K ⑂ 3.0K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Huly if

  • You weight community size — 28K stars and counting
  • You want the EPL-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Huly profile →

pick etherpad if

  • You want the etherpad feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and etherpad fits your workflow better

full etherpad profile →

About Huly

Huly is an open source, EPL 2.0 licensed, TypeScript built all in one work platform that folds project management, issue tracking, chat, CRM, HRM and applicant tracking into one system teams can run on their own servers, aimed at organisations that want the ground Jira, Linear, ClickUp, Slack and Notion cover without renting it from five separate vendors.

read the full Huly overview →

About etherpad

Etherpad is a real time collaborative document editor, written in TypeScript and released under Apache 2.0, for teams and institutions that need every keystroke attributed to its author, every revision preserved, and all text hosted on infrastructure they control.

read the full etherpad overview →

More in Business Software

Plane ★ 60K Twenty ★ 57K Odoo ★ 54K Cal.com ★ 49K Rocket.Chat ★ 46K cobalt ★ 43K

Related comparisons

plane vs huly plane vs rocket-chat plane vs cobalt plane vs buzz rocket-chat vs cobalt plane vs jitsi plane vs srs plane vs zulip plane vs anki twenty vs anki odoo vs anki cal-com vs anki plane vs tutor twenty vs tutor odoo vs tutor cal-com vs tutor plane vs hrms plane vs ever-gauzy twenty vs hrms twenty vs ever-gauzy odoo vs hrms odoo vs ever-gauzy plane vs horilla twenty vs horilla

More Collaboration & Communication projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Collaboration & Communication field.

Huly vs Plane Huly vs Rocket.Chat Huly vs cobalt Huly vs Buzz Huly vs Jitsi Huly vs srs Huly vs Zulip Huly vs drawnix Huly vs univer Huly vs chat Huly vs bigbluebutton Huly vs hedgedoc

Frequently asked questions

Is Huly or etherpad more popular?

Huly has 27,700 GitHub stars and etherpad has 18,552. Huly has the larger community by that measure.

Are Huly and etherpad free?

Both are open source. Huly is licensed under EPL-2.0 and etherpad under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Huly and etherpad?

Huly is written in TypeScript and etherpad in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Huly or etherpad?

Choose Huly if you want the larger community (27,700 stars) or its EPL-2.0 licence terms. Choose etherpad if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.