head to head · open source
hugo vs oqtane.framework
hugo has 90,326 GitHub stars, 8,447 forks, 235 open issues and last shipped yesterday. oqtane.framework has 2,259 stars, 641 forks, 27 open issues and last shipped yesterday. hugo leads on adoption by 3,898% (90,326 vs 2,259 stars). hugo is written in Go under Apache-2.0; oqtane.framework is written in C# under MIT. hugo has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, oqtane.framework 28%. hugo was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (cms), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| hugo | oqtane.framework | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 90K | ★ 2.3K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Written in | Go | C# |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.4K | ⑂ 641 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick hugo if
- You weight community size — 90K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick oqtane.framework if
- You want the oqtane.framework feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches C#
- You evaluated both and oqtane.framework fits your workflow better
About hugo
[Clang]: [GCC]: [Git]: [Go]: [bep]: [bugs]: [contributing]: CONTRIBUTING.md [create a proposal]: [dart sass]: [details]: [documentation repository]: [documentation]: [dragonfly bsd, freebsd, netbsd, and openbsd]: [features]: [forum]: [friends]: [hugo modules]: [installation]: [issue queue]: [linux]: [macos]: [prebuilt binary]: [requesting help]: [spf13]: [static site generator]: [support]: [themes]: [transpile sass to css]: [website]: [windows]: A fast and flexible static site generator built with love by [bep][], [spf13][], and [friends][] in Go. [Website][] [Installation][] [Documentation][] [Support][]…
About oqtane.framework
Oqtane Framework Oqtane is an open source Content Management System (CMS) and Application Framework that provides advanced functionality for developing web, mobile, and desktop applications on modern .NET. Oqtane allows you to "Build Applications, Not Infrastructure" which means that you can focus your efforts on solving your unique business challenges rather than wasting time and effort on building general infrastructure. Oqtane is "Rocket Fuel for Blazor" as it provides powerful capabilities to accelerate your Blazor development experience, providing scalable services and a composable UI which can be hosted on…
read the full oqtane.framework overview →
More in Content & Publishing
Related comparisons
More Content Management Systems (CMS) projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Content Management Systems (CMS) field.
Frequently asked questions
Is hugo or oqtane.framework more popular?
hugo has 90,326 GitHub stars and oqtane.framework has 2,259. hugo has the larger community by that measure.
Are hugo and oqtane.framework free?
Both are open source. hugo is licensed under Apache-2.0 and oqtane.framework under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between hugo and oqtane.framework?
hugo is written in Go and oqtane.framework in C#. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, hugo or oqtane.framework?
Choose hugo if you want the larger community (90,326 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose oqtane.framework if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.