head to head · open source

hugo vs OrchardCore

hugo has 89,854 GitHub stars, 8,381 forks, 235 open issues and last shipped yesterday. OrchardCore has 8,184 stars, 2,598 forks, 854 open issues and last shipped yesterday. hugo leads on adoption by 998% (89,854 vs 8,184 stars). hugo is written in Go under Apache-2.0; OrchardCore is written in C# under BSD-3-Clause. hugo has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, OrchardCore 32%. OrchardCore was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (cms), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

hugo ★ 90K OrchardCore ★ 8.2K category Content & Publishing

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

hugo OrchardCore
GitHub stars ★ 90K ★ 8.2K
License Apache-2.0 BSD-3-Clause
Written in Go C#
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 8.4K ⑂ 2.6K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick hugo if

  • You weight community size — 90K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full hugo profile →

pick OrchardCore if

  • You want the OrchardCore feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the BSD-3-Clause license terms
  • Your stack matches C#
  • You evaluated both and OrchardCore fits your workflow better

full OrchardCore profile →

About hugo

Hugo is a static site generator written in Go that renders a complete site in seconds, often less, and it is aimed at developers, technical writers, and content teams who build blogs, documentation sites, portfolios, landing pages, and corporate sites as static files.

read the full hugo overview →

About OrchardCore

Orchard Core is an open source, modular, multi tenant application framework and content management system built on ASP.NET Core, for .NET teams that want to build or self host modular web applications and content driven sites under the BSD 3 Clause licence.

read the full OrchardCore overview →

More in Content & Publishing

next.js ★ 142K storybook ★ 91K Understand-Anything ★ 83K Strapi ★ 73K nuxt ★ 61K gatsby ★ 56K

Related comparisons

hugo vs strapi hugo vs payload hugo vs halo hugo vs filament hugo vs wagtail hugo vs decap-cms strapi vs payload strapi vs halo next-js vs nuxt next-js vs gatsby next-js vs ghost next-js vs jekyll next-js vs hexo next-js vs nextra next-js vs kit next-js vs vike storybook vs understand-anything storybook vs devdocs storybook vs docsify understand-anything vs devdocs storybook vs wiki storybook vs mkdocs-material understand-anything vs docsify understand-anything vs wiki

More Content Management Systems (CMS) projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Content Management Systems (CMS) field.

hugo vs Strapi hugo vs Payload hugo vs halo hugo vs filament hugo vs wagtail hugo vs decap-cms hugo vs TinaCMS hugo vs frappe hugo vs Instatic hugo vs Publii hugo vs sanity hugo vs luban-h5

Frequently asked questions

Is hugo or OrchardCore more popular?

hugo has 89,854 GitHub stars and OrchardCore has 8,184. hugo has the larger community by that measure.

Are hugo and OrchardCore free?

Both are open source. hugo is licensed under Apache-2.0 and OrchardCore under BSD-3-Clause. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between hugo and OrchardCore?

hugo is written in Go and OrchardCore in C#. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, hugo or OrchardCore?

Choose hugo if you want the larger community (89,854 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose OrchardCore if its feature set, stack or BSD-3-Clause licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.