head to head · open source
hugo vs mix.core
hugo has 90,326 GitHub stars, 8,447 forks, 235 open issues and last shipped yesterday. mix.core has 888 stars, 223 forks, 2 open issues and last shipped 9 months ago. hugo leads on adoption by 10,072% (90,326 vs 888 stars). hugo is written in Go under Apache-2.0; mix.core is written in C# under MIT. hugo has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, mix.core 25%. hugo was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (cms, content-management-system), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| hugo | mix.core | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 90K | ★ 888 |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Written in | Go | C# |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-01-29 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.4K | ⑂ 223 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick hugo if
- You weight community size — 90K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick mix.core if
- You want the mix.core feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches C#
- You evaluated both and mix.core fits your workflow better
About hugo
[Clang]: [GCC]: [Git]: [Go]: [bep]: [bugs]: [contributing]: CONTRIBUTING.md [create a proposal]: [dart sass]: [details]: [documentation repository]: [documentation]: [dragonfly bsd, freebsd, netbsd, and openbsd]: [features]: [forum]: [friends]: [hugo modules]: [installation]: [issue queue]: [linux]: [macos]: [prebuilt binary]: [requesting help]: [spf13]: [static site generator]: [support]: [themes]: [transpile sass to css]: [website]: [windows]: A fast and flexible static site generator built with love by [bep][], [spf13][], and [friends][] in Go. [Website][] [Installation][] [Documentation][] [Support][]…
About mix.core
Mixcore CMS Fully Open Source UI Tools to create multi purpose Enterprise Web Apps, Mobile Apps & Application Services Branchs master : Mixcore v1.0.x LTS develop : Mixcore v2.0.0 alpha.x UI Screenshots Admin Portal Mixcore CMS Back office is built on top of the much awaited Bootstrap 5. This makes starting a new project very simple. It also provides benefits if you are already working on a Bootstrap 5 project. (New Portal in Angular / Svelte will be coming soon) Special features (Out of the box) [x] Databases MySQL, SQL Server, PostgreSQL, SQLite [x] Reliability Member roles and permissions. [x] High Security…
read the full mix.core overview →
More in Content & Publishing
Related comparisons
More Content Management Systems (CMS) projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Content Management Systems (CMS) field.
Frequently asked questions
Is hugo or mix.core more popular?
hugo has 90,326 GitHub stars and mix.core has 888. hugo has the larger community by that measure.
Are hugo and mix.core free?
Both are open source. hugo is licensed under Apache-2.0 and mix.core under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between hugo and mix.core?
hugo is written in Go and mix.core in C#. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, hugo or mix.core?
Choose hugo if you want the larger community (90,326 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose mix.core if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.