head to head · open source
hugo vs mix.core
hugo has 89,854 GitHub stars, 8,381 forks, 235 open issues and last shipped yesterday. mix.core has 888 stars, 224 forks, 2 open issues and last shipped 8 months ago. hugo leads on adoption by 10,019% (89,854 vs 888 stars). hugo is written in Go under Apache-2.0; mix.core is written in C# under MIT. hugo has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, mix.core 25%. hugo was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (cms, content-management-system), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| hugo | mix.core | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 90K | ★ 888 |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Written in | Go | C# |
| Last push | 2026-09-17 | 2026-01-29 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.4K | ⑂ 224 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick hugo if
- You weight community size — 90K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick mix.core if
- You want the mix.core feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches C#
- You evaluated both and mix.core fits your workflow better
About hugo
Hugo is a static site generator written in Go that renders a complete site in seconds, often less, and it is aimed at developers, technical writers, and content teams who build blogs, documentation sites, portfolios, landing pages, and corporate sites as static files.
About mix.core
Mix.core is an MIT licensed, open source enterprise web content management system built on ASP.NET Core / .NET Core that supports both headless and decoupled delivery, aimed at teams building multi purpose web apps, mobile backends, and application services who want customizable APIs rather than a fixed product.
read the full mix.core overview →
More in Content & Publishing
Related comparisons
More Content Management Systems (CMS) projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Content Management Systems (CMS) field.
Frequently asked questions
Is hugo or mix.core more popular?
hugo has 89,854 GitHub stars and mix.core has 888. hugo has the larger community by that measure.
Are hugo and mix.core free?
Both are open source. hugo is licensed under Apache-2.0 and mix.core under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between hugo and mix.core?
hugo is written in Go and mix.core in C#. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, hugo or mix.core?
Choose hugo if you want the larger community (89,854 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose mix.core if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.