head to head · open source

Hoppscotch vs Zappa

Hoppscotch has 80,331 GitHub stars, 6,110 forks, 820 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Zappa has 3,695 stars, 392 forks, 23 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. Hoppscotch leads on adoption by 2,074% (80,331 vs 3,695 stars). Hoppscotch is written in TypeScript under MIT; Zappa is written in Python under MIT. Hoppscotch has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, Zappa 11%. Hoppscotch was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Hoppscotch ★ 80K Zappa ★ 3.7K category Developer Tools

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Hoppscotch Zappa
GitHub stars ★ 80K ★ 3.7K
License MIT MIT
Written in TypeScript Python
Last push 2026-09-16 2026-09-15
Forks ⑂ 6.1K ⑂ 392
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Hoppscotch if

  • You weight community size — 80K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Hoppscotch profile →

pick Zappa if

  • You want the Zappa feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and Zappa fits your workflow better

full Zappa profile →

About Hoppscotch

Hoppscotch is an open source API development ecosystem that provides a full featured client for designing, testing, and documenting APIs. It operates as a web based application, desktop app, and CLI tool, supporting offline, on premises, and cloud deployments. Built with TypeScript and licensed under MIT, it serves as a direct open source alternative to proprietary tools like Postman and Insomnia.

read the full Hoppscotch overview →

About Zappa

Zappa is an open source Python project for deploying serverless web applications and APIs on AWS. It lives in the Python web framework ecosystem and the AWS serverless ecosystem, with topic tags for Flask, Django, Pyramid, Bottle, AWS Lambda, API Gateway, and ALB. The project is distributed under the MIT license and is categorized as a developer tool for API development and testing.

read the full Zappa overview →

More in Developer Tools

OpenCode ★ 208K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K pi ★ 107K fastapi ★ 102K Neovim ★ 102K

Related comparisons

fastapi vs hoppscotch hoppscotch vs bruno fastapi vs bruno fastapi vs insomnia fastapi vs one-api fastapi vs openapi-specification fastapi vs openapi-generator fastapi vs redoc opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip opencode vs orca opencode vs cline opencode vs aider opencode vs continue opencode vs tabby opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed langflow vs neovim langflow vs zed opencode vs kilocode opencode vs codeedit neovim vs zed langflow vs kilocode

More API Development & Testing projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the API Development & Testing field.

Hoppscotch vs fastapi Hoppscotch vs Bruno Hoppscotch vs Insomnia Hoppscotch vs one-api Hoppscotch vs OpenAPI-Specification Hoppscotch vs openapi-generator Hoppscotch vs redoc Hoppscotch vs SafeLine Hoppscotch vs Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF Hoppscotch vs grpc-gateway Hoppscotch vs Yaak Hoppscotch vs hurl

Frequently asked questions

Is Hoppscotch or Zappa more popular?

Hoppscotch has 80,331 GitHub stars and Zappa has 3,695. Hoppscotch has the larger community by that measure.

Are Hoppscotch and Zappa free?

Both are open source. Hoppscotch is licensed under MIT and Zappa under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Hoppscotch and Zappa?

Hoppscotch is written in TypeScript and Zappa in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Hoppscotch or Zappa?

Choose Hoppscotch if you want the larger community (80,331 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Zappa if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.