head to head · open source
Hoppscotch vs WunderGraph
Hoppscotch has 80,724 GitHub stars, 6,225 forks, 820 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. WunderGraph has 1,287 stars, 265 forks, 124 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Hoppscotch leads on adoption by 6,172% (80,724 vs 1,287 stars). Hoppscotch is written in TypeScript under MIT; WunderGraph is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0. Hoppscotch has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, WunderGraph 21%. WunderGraph was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (graphql), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Hoppscotch | WunderGraph | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 81K | ★ 1.3K |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-10-31 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 6.2K | ⑂ 265 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Hoppscotch if
- You weight community size — 81K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick WunderGraph if
- You want the WunderGraph feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and WunderGraph fits your workflow better
About Hoppscotch
Hoppscotch Open Source API Development Ecosystem Built with ❤︎ by contributors We highly recommend you take a look at the Hoppscotch Documentation to learn more about the app. Support Features ❤️ Lightweight: Crafted with minimalistic UI design. ⚡️ Fast: Send requests and get responses in real time. 🗄️ HTTP Methods: Request methods define the type of action you are requesting to be performed. GET Requests retrieve resource information POST The server creates a new entry in a database PUT Updates an existing resource PATCH Very similar to PUT but makes a partial update on a resource DELETE Deletes resource or…
read the full Hoppscotch overview →
About WunderGraph
WunderGraph Cosmo The GraphQL Federation Platform Reach for the stars, ignite your cosmo! Quickstart · Examples · Docs · CLI · Community · Changelog · Hiring Overview WunderGraph Cosmo is a comprehensive Lifecycle API Management platform tailored for Federated GraphQL. It encompasses everything from Schema Registry, composition checks, and analytics, to metrics, tracing, and routing. Whether you’re looking to deploy 100% on prem or prefer a Managed Service, Cosmo offers flexibility without vendor lock in, all under the Apache 2.0 license. The State of GraphQL Federation 2024 Get insights from industry experts…
read the full WunderGraph overview →
More in Developer Tools
Related comparisons
More API Development & Testing projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the API Development & Testing field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Hoppscotch or WunderGraph more popular?
Hoppscotch has 80,724 GitHub stars and WunderGraph has 1,287. Hoppscotch has the larger community by that measure.
Are Hoppscotch and WunderGraph free?
Both are open source. Hoppscotch is licensed under MIT and WunderGraph under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Hoppscotch and WunderGraph?
Hoppscotch is written in TypeScript and WunderGraph in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Hoppscotch or WunderGraph?
Choose Hoppscotch if you want the larger community (80,724 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose WunderGraph if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.