head to head · open source
Hoppscotch vs WireMock.Net
Hoppscotch has 80,724 GitHub stars, 6,225 forks, 820 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. WireMock.Net has 1,682 stars, 239 forks, 21 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Hoppscotch leads on adoption by 4,699% (80,724 vs 1,682 stars). Hoppscotch is written in TypeScript under MIT; WireMock.Net is written in C# under Apache-2.0. Hoppscotch has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, WireMock.Net 14%. WireMock.Net was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (http), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Hoppscotch | WireMock.Net | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 81K | ★ 1.7K |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | TypeScript | C# |
| Last push | 2026-10-31 | 2026-11-01 |
| Forks | ⑂ 6.2K | ⑂ 239 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Hoppscotch if
- You weight community size — 81K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick WireMock.Net if
- You want the WireMock.Net feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches C#
- You evaluated both and WireMock.Net fits your workflow better
About Hoppscotch
Hoppscotch Open Source API Development Ecosystem Built with ❤︎ by contributors We highly recommend you take a look at the Hoppscotch Documentation to learn more about the app. Support Features ❤️ Lightweight: Crafted with minimalistic UI design. ⚡️ Fast: Send requests and get responses in real time. 🗄️ HTTP Methods: Request methods define the type of action you are requesting to be performed. GET Requests retrieve resource information POST The server creates a new entry in a database PUT Updates an existing resource PATCH Very similar to PUT but makes a partial update on a resource DELETE Deletes resource or…
read the full Hoppscotch overview →
About WireMock.Net
WireMock.Net A C .NET version based on mock4net which mimics functionality from the original Java based WireMock. :books: Full documentation can now be found at wiremock.org :star: Key Features HTTP response stubbing, matchable on URL/Path, headers, cookies and body content patterns Library can be used in unit tests and integration tests Runs as a standalone process, as windows service, as Azure/IIS or as docker Configurable via a fluent C .NET API, JSON files and JSON over HTTP Record/playback of stubs (proxying) Per request conditional proxying Stateful behaviour simulation Response templating / transformation…
read the full WireMock.Net overview →
More in Developer Tools
Related comparisons
More API Development & Testing projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the API Development & Testing field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Hoppscotch or WireMock.Net more popular?
Hoppscotch has 80,724 GitHub stars and WireMock.Net has 1,682. Hoppscotch has the larger community by that measure.
Are Hoppscotch and WireMock.Net free?
Both are open source. Hoppscotch is licensed under MIT and WireMock.Net under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Hoppscotch and WireMock.Net?
Hoppscotch is written in TypeScript and WireMock.Net in C#. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Hoppscotch or WireMock.Net?
Choose Hoppscotch if you want the larger community (80,724 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose WireMock.Net if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.