head to head · open source
Hoppscotch vs WebApiClient
Hoppscotch has 80,724 GitHub stars, 6,225 forks, 820 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. WebApiClient has 2,136 stars, 445 forks, 14 open issues and last shipped 4 months ago. Hoppscotch leads on adoption by 3,679% (80,724 vs 2,136 stars). Hoppscotch is written in TypeScript under MIT; WebApiClient is written in C# under MIT. Hoppscotch has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, WebApiClient 21%. Hoppscotch was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Hoppscotch | WebApiClient | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 81K | ★ 2.1K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | C# |
| Last push | 2026-10-31 | 2026-07-17 |
| Forks | ⑂ 6.2K | ⑂ 445 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Hoppscotch if
- You weight community size — 81K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick WebApiClient if
- You want the WebApiClient feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches C#
- You evaluated both and WebApiClient fits your workflow better
About Hoppscotch
Hoppscotch Open Source API Development Ecosystem Built with ❤︎ by contributors We highly recommend you take a look at the Hoppscotch Documentation to learn more about the app. Support Features ❤️ Lightweight: Crafted with minimalistic UI design. ⚡️ Fast: Send requests and get responses in real time. 🗄️ HTTP Methods: Request methods define the type of action you are requesting to be performed. GET Requests retrieve resource information POST The server creates a new entry in a database PUT Updates an existing resource PATCH Very similar to PUT but makes a partial update on a resource DELETE Deletes resource or…
read the full Hoppscotch overview →
About WebApiClient
README 中文文档 WebApiClient A REST API library with better functionality, performance, and scalability than refit. Features Semantic Declaration Client development only requires semantic declaration of C interfaces. Diverse serialization Supports json, xml, form and other custom serialization methods. Full trimmed and AOT Supports full trimmed and AOT publishing of .NET8. Aspect Oriented Programming Supports multiple interceptors, filters, logs, retries, custom caches and other aspects. Code Syntax Analysis Provides syntax analysis and prompts for interface code declarations to help developers avoid using improper…
read the full WebApiClient overview →
More in Developer Tools
Related comparisons
More API Development & Testing projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the API Development & Testing field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Hoppscotch or WebApiClient more popular?
Hoppscotch has 80,724 GitHub stars and WebApiClient has 2,136. Hoppscotch has the larger community by that measure.
Are Hoppscotch and WebApiClient free?
Both are open source. Hoppscotch is licensed under MIT and WebApiClient under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Hoppscotch and WebApiClient?
Hoppscotch is written in TypeScript and WebApiClient in C#. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Hoppscotch or WebApiClient?
Choose Hoppscotch if you want the larger community (80,724 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose WebApiClient if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.