head to head · open source
Hoppscotch vs uvicorn-gunicorn-fastapi-docker
Hoppscotch has 80,336 GitHub stars, 6,112 forks, 820 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. uvicorn-gunicorn-fastapi-docker has 2,914 stars, 341 forks, 1 open issues and last shipped 7 days ago. Hoppscotch leads on adoption by 2,657% (80,336 vs 2,914 stars). Hoppscotch is written in TypeScript under MIT; uvicorn-gunicorn-fastapi-docker is written in Python under MIT. Hoppscotch has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, uvicorn-gunicorn-fastapi-docker 12%. Hoppscotch was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Hoppscotch | uvicorn-gunicorn-fastapi-docker | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 80K | ★ 2.9K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | Python |
| Last push | 2026-09-16 | 2026-09-11 |
| Forks | ⑂ 6.1K | ⑂ 341 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Hoppscotch if
- You weight community size — 80K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick uvicorn-gunicorn-fastapi-docker if
- You want the uvicorn-gunicorn-fastapi-docker feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and uvicorn-gunicorn-fastapi-docker fits your workflow better
About Hoppscotch
Hoppscotch is an open source API development ecosystem that provides a full featured client for designing, testing, and documenting APIs. It operates as a web based application, desktop app, and CLI tool, supporting offline, on premises, and cloud deployments. Built with TypeScript and licensed under MIT, it serves as a direct open source alternative to proprietary tools like Postman and Insomnia.
read the full Hoppscotch overview →
About uvicorn-gunicorn-fastapi-docker
DEPRECATED 🚨 This Docker image is now deprecated. There's no need to use it, you can just use Uvicorn with workers . ✨ Read more about it below. Supported tags and respective Dockerfile links python3.11 , latest (Dockerfile) python3.10 , (Dockerfile) python3.11 slim (Dockerfile) python3.10 slim (Dockerfile) Deprecated tags 🚨 These tags are no longer supported or maintained, they are removed from the GitHub repository, but the last versions pushed might still be available in Docker Hub if anyone has been pulling them: python3.9 python3.9 slim python3.8 python3.8 slim python3.7 python3.9 alpine3.14 python3.8 alpi…
read the full uvicorn-gunicorn-fastapi-docker overview →
More in Developer Tools
Related comparisons
More API Development & Testing projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the API Development & Testing field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Hoppscotch or uvicorn-gunicorn-fastapi-docker more popular?
Hoppscotch has 80,336 GitHub stars and uvicorn-gunicorn-fastapi-docker has 2,914. Hoppscotch has the larger community by that measure.
Are Hoppscotch and uvicorn-gunicorn-fastapi-docker free?
Both are open source. Hoppscotch is licensed under MIT and uvicorn-gunicorn-fastapi-docker under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Hoppscotch and uvicorn-gunicorn-fastapi-docker?
Hoppscotch is written in TypeScript and uvicorn-gunicorn-fastapi-docker in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Hoppscotch or uvicorn-gunicorn-fastapi-docker?
Choose Hoppscotch if you want the larger community (80,336 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose uvicorn-gunicorn-fastapi-docker if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.