head to head · open source

Hoppscotch vs swift-openapi-generator

Hoppscotch has 80,724 GitHub stars, 6,225 forks, 820 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. swift-openapi-generator has 1,994 stars, 195 forks, 132 open issues and last shipped 8 days ago. Hoppscotch leads on adoption by 3,948% (80,724 vs 1,994 stars). Hoppscotch is written in TypeScript under MIT; swift-openapi-generator is written in Swift under Apache-2.0. Hoppscotch has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, swift-openapi-generator 10%. Hoppscotch was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Hoppscotch ★ 81K swift-openapi-generator ★ 2.0K category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Hoppscotch swift-openapi-generator
GitHub stars ★ 81K ★ 2.0K
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in TypeScript Swift
Last push 2026-10-31 2026-10-26
Forks ⑂ 6.2K ⑂ 195
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Hoppscotch if

  • You weight community size — 81K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Hoppscotch profile →

pick swift-openapi-generator if

  • You want the swift-openapi-generator feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Swift
  • You evaluated both and swift-openapi-generator fits your workflow better

full swift-openapi-generator profile →

About Hoppscotch

Hoppscotch Open Source API Development Ecosystem Built with ❤︎ by contributors We highly recommend you take a look at the Hoppscotch Documentation to learn more about the app. Support Features ❤️ Lightweight: Crafted with minimalistic UI design. ⚡️ Fast: Send requests and get responses in real time. 🗄️ HTTP Methods: Request methods define the type of action you are requesting to be performed. GET Requests retrieve resource information POST The server creates a new entry in a database PUT Updates an existing resource PATCH Very similar to PUT but makes a partial update on a resource DELETE Deletes resource or…

read the full Hoppscotch overview →

About swift-openapi-generator

Swift OpenAPI Generator Generate Swift client and server code from an OpenAPI document. Overview [OpenAPI][openapi] is a specification for documenting HTTP services. An OpenAPI document is written in either YAML or JSON, and can be read by tools to help automate workflows, such as generating the necessary code to send and receive HTTP requests. Swift OpenAPI Generator is a Swift package plugin that can generate the ceremony code required to make API calls, or implement API servers. The code is generated at build time, so it's always in sync with the OpenAPI document and doesn't need to be committed to your…

read the full swift-openapi-generator overview →

More in Developer Tools

Related comparisons

More API Development & Testing projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the API Development & Testing field.

Frequently asked questions

Is Hoppscotch or swift-openapi-generator more popular?

Hoppscotch has 80,724 GitHub stars and swift-openapi-generator has 1,994. Hoppscotch has the larger community by that measure.

Are Hoppscotch and swift-openapi-generator free?

Both are open source. Hoppscotch is licensed under MIT and swift-openapi-generator under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Hoppscotch and swift-openapi-generator?

Hoppscotch is written in TypeScript and swift-openapi-generator in Swift. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Hoppscotch or swift-openapi-generator?

Choose Hoppscotch if you want the larger community (80,724 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose swift-openapi-generator if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.