head to head · open source

Hoppscotch vs swag

Hoppscotch has 80,331 GitHub stars, 6,110 forks, 820 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. swag has 13,024 stars, 1,547 forks, 476 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. Hoppscotch leads on adoption by 517% (80,331 vs 13,024 stars). Hoppscotch is written in TypeScript under MIT; swag is written in Go under MIT. Hoppscotch has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, swag 12%. Hoppscotch was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Hoppscotch ★ 80K swag ★ 13K category Developer Tools

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Hoppscotch swag
GitHub stars ★ 80K ★ 13K
License MIT MIT
Written in TypeScript Go
Last push 2026-09-16 2026-09-13
Forks ⑂ 6.1K ⑂ 1.5K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Hoppscotch if

  • You weight community size — 80K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Hoppscotch profile →

pick swag if

  • You want the swag feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and swag fits your workflow better

full swag profile →

About Hoppscotch

Hoppscotch is an open source API development ecosystem that provides a full featured client for designing, testing, and documenting APIs. It operates as a web based application, desktop app, and CLI tool, supporting offline, on premises, and cloud deployments. Built with TypeScript and licensed under MIT, it serves as a direct open source alternative to proprietary tools like Postman and Insomnia.

read the full Hoppscotch overview →

About swag

Swag is a command line tool that converts Go source annotations into Swagger 2.0 documentation. It lives in the Go ecosystem, is distributed under the MIT license, and is maintained by the swaggo organization. The project has been active for nine years, with the most recent push recorded in September 2026, and it carries roughly 13,000 stars and 1,545 forks on GitHub.

read the full swag overview →

More in Developer Tools

OpenCode ★ 208K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K pi ★ 107K fastapi ★ 102K Neovim ★ 102K

Related comparisons

fastapi vs hoppscotch hoppscotch vs bruno fastapi vs bruno fastapi vs insomnia fastapi vs one-api fastapi vs openapi-specification fastapi vs openapi-generator fastapi vs redoc opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip opencode vs orca opencode vs cline opencode vs aider opencode vs continue opencode vs tabby opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed langflow vs neovim langflow vs zed opencode vs kilocode opencode vs codeedit neovim vs zed langflow vs kilocode

More API Development & Testing projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the API Development & Testing field.

Hoppscotch vs fastapi Hoppscotch vs Bruno Hoppscotch vs Insomnia Hoppscotch vs one-api Hoppscotch vs OpenAPI-Specification Hoppscotch vs openapi-generator Hoppscotch vs redoc Hoppscotch vs SafeLine Hoppscotch vs Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF Hoppscotch vs grpc-gateway Hoppscotch vs Yaak Hoppscotch vs hurl

Frequently asked questions

Is Hoppscotch or swag more popular?

Hoppscotch has 80,331 GitHub stars and swag has 13,024. Hoppscotch has the larger community by that measure.

Are Hoppscotch and swag free?

Both are open source. Hoppscotch is licensed under MIT and swag under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Hoppscotch and swag?

Hoppscotch is written in TypeScript and swag in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Hoppscotch or swag?

Choose Hoppscotch if you want the larger community (80,331 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose swag if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.