head to head · open source
Hoppscotch vs standard-webhooks
Hoppscotch has 80,724 GitHub stars, 6,225 forks, 820 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. standard-webhooks has 1,787 stars, 79 forks, 62 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. Hoppscotch leads on adoption by 4,417% (80,724 vs 1,787 stars). Hoppscotch is written in TypeScript under MIT; standard-webhooks is written in Java under Apache-2.0. Hoppscotch has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, standard-webhooks 4%. Hoppscotch was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (api, http), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Hoppscotch | standard-webhooks | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 81K | ★ 1.8K |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | TypeScript | Java |
| Last push | 2026-10-31 | 2026-10-30 |
| Forks | ⑂ 6.2K | ⑂ 79 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Hoppscotch if
- You weight community size — 81K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick standard-webhooks if
- You want the standard-webhooks feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Java
- You evaluated both and standard-webhooks fits your workflow better
About Hoppscotch
Hoppscotch Open Source API Development Ecosystem Built with ❤︎ by contributors We highly recommend you take a look at the Hoppscotch Documentation to learn more about the app. Support Features ❤️ Lightweight: Crafted with minimalistic UI design. ⚡️ Fast: Send requests and get responses in real time. 🗄️ HTTP Methods: Request methods define the type of action you are requesting to be performed. GET Requests retrieve resource information POST The server creates a new entry in a database PUT Updates an existing resource PATCH Very similar to PUT but makes a partial update on a resource DELETE Deletes resource or…
read the full Hoppscotch overview →
About standard-webhooks
Open source tools and guidelines for sending webhooks easily, securely, and reliably Introduction Webhooks are becoming increasingly popular and are used by many of the world's top companies for sending events to users of their APIs. However, the ecosystem is fragmented, with each webhook provider using different implementations and varying quality. Even high quality implementations vary, making them inherently incompatible. This fragmentation is a pain for the providers and consumers, stifling innovation. For consumers, this means handling webhooks differently for every provider, relearning how to verify…
read the full standard-webhooks overview →
More in Developer Tools
Related comparisons
More API Development & Testing projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the API Development & Testing field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Hoppscotch or standard-webhooks more popular?
Hoppscotch has 80,724 GitHub stars and standard-webhooks has 1,787. Hoppscotch has the larger community by that measure.
Are Hoppscotch and standard-webhooks free?
Both are open source. Hoppscotch is licensed under MIT and standard-webhooks under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Hoppscotch and standard-webhooks?
Hoppscotch is written in TypeScript and standard-webhooks in Java. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Hoppscotch or standard-webhooks?
Choose Hoppscotch if you want the larger community (80,724 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose standard-webhooks if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.