head to head · open source
Hoppscotch vs serverless-java-container
Hoppscotch has 80,336 GitHub stars, 6,112 forks, 820 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. serverless-java-container has 1,564 stars, 574 forks, 113 open issues and last shipped 28 days ago. Hoppscotch leads on adoption by 5,037% (80,336 vs 1,564 stars). Hoppscotch is written in TypeScript under MIT; serverless-java-container is written in Java under Apache-2.0. Hoppscotch has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, serverless-java-container 37%. Hoppscotch was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (api, rest-api), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Hoppscotch | serverless-java-container | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 80K | ★ 1.6K |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | TypeScript | Java |
| Last push | 2026-09-16 | 2026-08-21 |
| Forks | ⑂ 6.1K | ⑂ 574 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Hoppscotch if
- You weight community size — 80K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick serverless-java-container if
- You want the serverless-java-container feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Java
- You evaluated both and serverless-java-container fits your workflow better
About Hoppscotch
Hoppscotch is an open source API development ecosystem that provides a full featured client for designing, testing, and documenting APIs. It operates as a web based application, desktop app, and CLI tool, supporting offline, on premises, and cloud deployments. Built with TypeScript and licensed under MIT, it serves as a direct open source alternative to proprietary tools like Postman and Insomnia.
read the full Hoppscotch overview →
About serverless-java-container
Serverless Java container The aws serverless java container makes it easy to run Java applications written with frameworks such as Spring, Spring Boot, Apache Struts, Jersey, or Spark in AWS Lambda. Serverless Java Container natively supports API Gateway's proxy integration models for requests and responses, you can create and inject custom models for methods that use custom mappings. Currently the following versions are maintained: Follow the quick start guides in our wiki to integrate Serverless Java Container with your project: Spring quick start Spring Boot 2 quick start Spring Boot 3 quick start Spring Boot …
read the full serverless-java-container overview →
More in Developer Tools
Related comparisons
More API Development & Testing projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the API Development & Testing field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Hoppscotch or serverless-java-container more popular?
Hoppscotch has 80,336 GitHub stars and serverless-java-container has 1,564. Hoppscotch has the larger community by that measure.
Are Hoppscotch and serverless-java-container free?
Both are open source. Hoppscotch is licensed under MIT and serverless-java-container under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Hoppscotch and serverless-java-container?
Hoppscotch is written in TypeScript and serverless-java-container in Java. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Hoppscotch or serverless-java-container?
Choose Hoppscotch if you want the larger community (80,336 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose serverless-java-container if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.