head to head · open source

Hoppscotch vs RWKV-Runner

Hoppscotch has 80,331 GitHub stars, 6,110 forks, 820 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. RWKV-Runner has 6,479 stars, 601 forks, 178 open issues and last shipped 14 days ago. Hoppscotch leads on adoption by 1,140% (80,331 vs 6,479 stars). Hoppscotch is written in TypeScript under MIT; RWKV-Runner is written in TypeScript under MIT. Hoppscotch has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, RWKV-Runner 9%. Hoppscotch was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (api, api-client), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Hoppscotch ★ 80K RWKV-Runner ★ 6.5K category Developer Tools

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Hoppscotch RWKV-Runner
GitHub stars ★ 80K ★ 6.5K
License MIT MIT
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-16 2026-09-04
Forks ⑂ 6.1K ⑂ 601
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Hoppscotch if

  • You weight community size — 80K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Hoppscotch profile →

pick RWKV-Runner if

  • You want the RWKV-Runner feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and RWKV-Runner fits your workflow better

full RWKV-Runner profile →

About Hoppscotch

Hoppscotch is an open source API development ecosystem that provides a full featured client for designing, testing, and documenting APIs. It operates as a web based application, desktop app, and CLI tool, supporting offline, on premises, and cloud deployments. Built with TypeScript and licensed under MIT, it serves as a direct open source alternative to proprietary tools like Postman and Insomnia.

read the full Hoppscotch overview →

About RWKV-Runner

RWKV Runner is a management and startup tool for RWKV, an open source large language model that is available for commercial use. It ships as a lightweight executable of only a few megabytes and automates the work of getting a model running, so that the user does not have to assemble the runtime, dependencies, and serving stack by hand. The project is written in TypeScript and built with Wails, and it is distributed under the MIT license from the josStorer repository. It lives in the RWKV ecosystem and in the broader local inference tooling space, with a companion site at rwkv.com.

read the full RWKV-Runner overview →

More in Developer Tools

OpenCode ★ 208K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K pi ★ 107K fastapi ★ 102K Neovim ★ 102K

Related comparisons

fastapi vs hoppscotch hoppscotch vs bruno fastapi vs bruno fastapi vs insomnia fastapi vs one-api fastapi vs openapi-specification fastapi vs openapi-generator fastapi vs redoc opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip opencode vs orca opencode vs cline opencode vs aider opencode vs continue opencode vs tabby opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed langflow vs neovim langflow vs zed opencode vs kilocode opencode vs codeedit neovim vs zed langflow vs kilocode

More API Development & Testing projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the API Development & Testing field.

Hoppscotch vs fastapi Hoppscotch vs Bruno Hoppscotch vs Insomnia Hoppscotch vs one-api Hoppscotch vs OpenAPI-Specification Hoppscotch vs openapi-generator Hoppscotch vs redoc Hoppscotch vs SafeLine Hoppscotch vs Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF Hoppscotch vs grpc-gateway Hoppscotch vs Yaak Hoppscotch vs hurl

Frequently asked questions

Is Hoppscotch or RWKV-Runner more popular?

Hoppscotch has 80,331 GitHub stars and RWKV-Runner has 6,479. Hoppscotch has the larger community by that measure.

Are Hoppscotch and RWKV-Runner free?

Both are open source. Hoppscotch is licensed under MIT and RWKV-Runner under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Hoppscotch and RWKV-Runner?

Hoppscotch is written in TypeScript and RWKV-Runner in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Hoppscotch or RWKV-Runner?

Choose Hoppscotch if you want the larger community (80,331 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose RWKV-Runner if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.