head to head · open source
Hoppscotch vs reactive-interaction-gateway
Hoppscotch has 80,724 GitHub stars, 6,225 forks, 820 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. reactive-interaction-gateway has 602 stars, 68 forks, 74 open issues and last shipped 7 months ago. Hoppscotch leads on adoption by 13,309% (80,724 vs 602 stars). Hoppscotch is written in TypeScript under MIT; reactive-interaction-gateway is written in Elixir under Apache-2.0. Hoppscotch has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, reactive-interaction-gateway 11%. Hoppscotch was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Hoppscotch | reactive-interaction-gateway | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 81K | ★ 602 |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | TypeScript | Elixir |
| Last push | 2026-10-31 | 2026-04-16 |
| Forks | ⑂ 6.2K | ⑂ 68 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Hoppscotch if
- You weight community size — 81K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick reactive-interaction-gateway if
- You want the reactive-interaction-gateway feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Elixir
- You evaluated both and reactive-interaction-gateway fits your workflow better
About Hoppscotch
Hoppscotch Open Source API Development Ecosystem Built with ❤︎ by contributors We highly recommend you take a look at the Hoppscotch Documentation to learn more about the app. Support Features ❤️ Lightweight: Crafted with minimalistic UI design. ⚡️ Fast: Send requests and get responses in real time. 🗄️ HTTP Methods: Request methods define the type of action you are requesting to be performed. GET Requests retrieve resource information POST The server creates a new entry in a database PUT Updates an existing resource PATCH Very similar to PUT but makes a partial update on a resource DELETE Deletes resource or…
read the full Hoppscotch overview →
About reactive-interaction-gateway
RIG Reactive Interaction Gateway Makes frontend backend communication reactive and event driven. About The Reactive Interaction Gateway (RIG) is the glue between your client (frontend) and your backend. It makes communication between them easier by (click the links to learn more) picking up backend events and forwarding them to clients based on subscriptions: this makes your frontend apps reactive and eliminates the need for polling . You can do this asynchronously using Kafka, Nats or Kinesis. synchronously if you don't want to manage a (potentially complex) message broker system like Kafka. forwarding client…
read the full reactive-interaction-gateway overview →
More in Developer Tools
Related comparisons
More API Development & Testing projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the API Development & Testing field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Hoppscotch or reactive-interaction-gateway more popular?
Hoppscotch has 80,724 GitHub stars and reactive-interaction-gateway has 602. Hoppscotch has the larger community by that measure.
Are Hoppscotch and reactive-interaction-gateway free?
Both are open source. Hoppscotch is licensed under MIT and reactive-interaction-gateway under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Hoppscotch and reactive-interaction-gateway?
Hoppscotch is written in TypeScript and reactive-interaction-gateway in Elixir. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Hoppscotch or reactive-interaction-gateway?
Choose Hoppscotch if you want the larger community (80,724 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose reactive-interaction-gateway if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.