head to head · open source
Hoppscotch vs qbittorrent-api
Hoppscotch has 80,724 GitHub stars, 6,225 forks, 820 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. qbittorrent-api has 518 stars, 77 forks, 5 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Hoppscotch leads on adoption by 15,484% (80,724 vs 518 stars). Hoppscotch is written in TypeScript under MIT; qbittorrent-api is written in Python under MIT. Hoppscotch has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, qbittorrent-api 15%. qbittorrent-api was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (api, api-client), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Hoppscotch | qbittorrent-api | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 81K | ★ 518 |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | Python |
| Last push | 2026-10-31 | 2026-11-01 |
| Forks | ⑂ 6.2K | ⑂ 77 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Hoppscotch if
- You weight community size — 81K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick qbittorrent-api if
- You want the qbittorrent-api feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and qbittorrent-api fits your workflow better
About Hoppscotch
Hoppscotch Open Source API Development Ecosystem Built with ❤︎ by contributors We highly recommend you take a look at the Hoppscotch Documentation to learn more about the app. Support Features ❤️ Lightweight: Crafted with minimalistic UI design. ⚡️ Fast: Send requests and get responses in real time. 🗄️ HTTP Methods: Request methods define the type of action you are requesting to be performed. GET Requests retrieve resource information POST The server creates a new entry in a database PUT Updates an existing resource PATCH Very similar to PUT but makes a partial update on a resource DELETE Deletes resource or…
read the full Hoppscotch overview →
About qbittorrent-api
qBittorrent Web API Client ========================== Python client implementation for qBittorrent Web API Currently supports qBittorrent v5.2.3 (Web API v2.15.1) released on July 7, 2026. User Guide and API Reference available on Read the Docs. Features The entire qBittorrent Web API) is implemented. qBittorrent version checking for an endpoint's existence/features is automatically handled. If the authentication cookie expires, a new one is automatically requested in line with any API call. Installation Install via pip from PyPI Getting Started
read the full qbittorrent-api overview →
More in Developer Tools
Related comparisons
More API Development & Testing projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the API Development & Testing field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Hoppscotch or qbittorrent-api more popular?
Hoppscotch has 80,724 GitHub stars and qbittorrent-api has 518. Hoppscotch has the larger community by that measure.
Are Hoppscotch and qbittorrent-api free?
Both are open source. Hoppscotch is licensed under MIT and qbittorrent-api under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Hoppscotch and qbittorrent-api?
Hoppscotch is written in TypeScript and qbittorrent-api in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Hoppscotch or qbittorrent-api?
Choose Hoppscotch if you want the larger community (80,724 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose qbittorrent-api if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.