head to head · open source
Hoppscotch vs platformatic
Hoppscotch has 80,724 GitHub stars, 6,225 forks, 820 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. platformatic has 2,135 stars, 211 forks, 15 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Hoppscotch leads on adoption by 3,681% (80,724 vs 2,135 stars). Hoppscotch is written in TypeScript under MIT; platformatic is written in JavaScript under Apache-2.0. Hoppscotch has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, platformatic 10%. platformatic was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (graphql, rest), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Hoppscotch | platformatic | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 81K | ★ 2.1K |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | TypeScript | JavaScript |
| Last push | 2026-10-31 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 6.2K | ⑂ 211 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Hoppscotch if
- You weight community size — 81K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick platformatic if
- You want the platformatic feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You evaluated both and platformatic fits your workflow better
About Hoppscotch
Hoppscotch Open Source API Development Ecosystem Built with ❤︎ by contributors We highly recommend you take a look at the Hoppscotch Documentation to learn more about the app. Support Features ❤️ Lightweight: Crafted with minimalistic UI design. ⚡️ Fast: Send requests and get responses in real time. 🗄️ HTTP Methods: Request methods define the type of action you are requesting to be performed. GET Requests retrieve resource information POST The server creates a new entry in a database PUT Updates an existing resource PATCH Very similar to PUT but makes a partial update on a resource DELETE Deletes resource or…
read the full Hoppscotch overview →
About platformatic
Watt The Node.js Application Server Watt takes any Node.js application, written in any framework, and runs it as a worker thread so you can ship faster and scale smarter in any containerized environment. What problems was Watt built to solve? Speed and Stability at Scale When run as a single thread, Node.js fails to efficiently consume the CPU allocated to it, causing the event loop to become blocked during periods of heavy traffic, which leads to spikes in latency and crashes. Even worse, because that single thread is also responsible for all your key telemetry data, you lose critical observability when your…
read the full platformatic overview →
More in Developer Tools
Related comparisons
More API Development & Testing projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the API Development & Testing field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Hoppscotch or platformatic more popular?
Hoppscotch has 80,724 GitHub stars and platformatic has 2,135. Hoppscotch has the larger community by that measure.
Are Hoppscotch and platformatic free?
Both are open source. Hoppscotch is licensed under MIT and platformatic under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Hoppscotch and platformatic?
Hoppscotch is written in TypeScript and platformatic in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Hoppscotch or platformatic?
Choose Hoppscotch if you want the larger community (80,724 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose platformatic if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.