head to head · open source
Hoppscotch vs open-connector
Hoppscotch has 80,724 GitHub stars, 6,225 forks, 820 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. open-connector has 6,163 stars, 586 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Hoppscotch leads on adoption by 1,210% (80,724 vs 6,163 stars). Hoppscotch is written in TypeScript under MIT; open-connector is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence. Hoppscotch has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, open-connector 10%. open-connector was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Hoppscotch | open-connector | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 81K | ★ 6.2K |
| License | MIT | Custom / other |
| Written in | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-10-31 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 6.2K | ⑂ 586 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Hoppscotch if
- You weight community size — 81K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick open-connector if
- You want the open-connector feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Custom / other license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and open-connector fits your workflow better
About Hoppscotch
Hoppscotch Open Source API Development Ecosystem Built with ❤︎ by contributors We highly recommend you take a look at the Hoppscotch Documentation to learn more about the app. Support Features ❤️ Lightweight: Crafted with minimalistic UI design. ⚡️ Fast: Send requests and get responses in real time. 🗄️ HTTP Methods: Request methods define the type of action you are requesting to be performed. GET Requests retrieve resource information POST The server creates a new entry in a database PUT Updates an existing resource PATCH Very similar to PUT but makes a partial update on a resource DELETE Deletes resource or…
read the full Hoppscotch overview →
About open-connector
English 简体中文 繁體中文 日本語 한국어 Русский Français Español OpenConnector is an open source connector gateway for AI agents and an alternative to Pipedream/Composio. Connect user app accounts once, then expose a shared catalog of 1,000+ providers and 10,000+ prebuilt Actions to agents and applications. Managed OAuth and hosted runtime, ready to use. No deployment or OAuth app setup. Run locally or on your own infrastructure with Docker or Node.js. You manage storage and OAuth apps. Cloudflare , Fly.io , RepoCloud , nibrun , and more. 🚀 OOMOL Hosted Self host More platforms Use the Connector SDK from app code, oo CLI as…
read the full open-connector overview →
More in Developer Tools
Related comparisons
More API Development & Testing projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the API Development & Testing field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Hoppscotch or open-connector more popular?
Hoppscotch has 80,724 GitHub stars and open-connector has 6,163. Hoppscotch has the larger community by that measure.
Are Hoppscotch and open-connector free?
Both are open source. Hoppscotch is licensed under MIT, and open-connector has no licence declared in this registry. Both are free to self-host.
What is the difference between Hoppscotch and open-connector?
Hoppscotch is written in TypeScript and open-connector in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Hoppscotch or open-connector?
Choose Hoppscotch if you want the larger community (80,724 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose open-connector if its feature set, stack or Custom / other licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.