head to head · open source
Hoppscotch vs metamcp
Hoppscotch has 80,724 GitHub stars, 6,225 forks, 820 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. metamcp has 2,744 stars, 445 forks, 110 open issues and last shipped 4 months ago. Hoppscotch leads on adoption by 2,842% (80,724 vs 2,744 stars). Hoppscotch is written in TypeScript under MIT; metamcp is written in TypeScript under MIT. Hoppscotch has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, metamcp 16%. Hoppscotch was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Hoppscotch | metamcp | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 81K | ★ 2.7K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-10-31 | 2026-06-22 |
| Forks | ⑂ 6.2K | ⑂ 445 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Hoppscotch if
- You weight community size — 81K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick metamcp if
- You want the metamcp feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and metamcp fits your workflow better
About Hoppscotch
Hoppscotch Open Source API Development Ecosystem Built with ❤︎ by contributors We highly recommend you take a look at the Hoppscotch Documentation to learn more about the app. Support Features ❤️ Lightweight: Crafted with minimalistic UI design. ⚡️ Fast: Send requests and get responses in real time. 🗄️ HTTP Methods: Request methods define the type of action you are requesting to be performed. GET Requests retrieve resource information POST The server creates a new entry in a database PUT Updates an existing resource PATCH Very similar to PUT but makes a partial update on a resource DELETE Deletes resource or…
read the full Hoppscotch overview →
About metamcp
🚀 MetaMCP (MCP Aggregator, Orchestrator, Middleware, Gateway in one docker) 📢 Latest Update: This ai dev branch will be the forward onging dev branch which contains ai agent changes. Please test before you build the image based on this branch. There has been many PRs thanks to the community but merging and reviewing them has been a growing effort too. I decided to include ai changes. At least so far the core functionality works. There is also a community maintained fork (ty a lot!): 📢 Update: From the author: apologize for some recent maintainence delay, but will at least keep merging PRs, more background…
read the full metamcp overview →
More in Developer Tools
Related comparisons
More API Development & Testing projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the API Development & Testing field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Hoppscotch or metamcp more popular?
Hoppscotch has 80,724 GitHub stars and metamcp has 2,744. Hoppscotch has the larger community by that measure.
Are Hoppscotch and metamcp free?
Both are open source. Hoppscotch is licensed under MIT and metamcp under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Hoppscotch and metamcp?
Hoppscotch is written in TypeScript and metamcp in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Hoppscotch or metamcp?
Choose Hoppscotch if you want the larger community (80,724 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose metamcp if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.