head to head · open source
Hoppscotch vs kubernetes-client
Hoppscotch has 80,724 GitHub stars, 6,225 forks, 820 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. kubernetes-client has 3,685 stars, 1,520 forks, 115 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. Hoppscotch leads on adoption by 2,091% (80,724 vs 3,685 stars). Hoppscotch is written in TypeScript under MIT; kubernetes-client is written in Java under Apache-2.0. Hoppscotch has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, kubernetes-client 41%. Hoppscotch was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Hoppscotch | kubernetes-client | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 81K | ★ 3.7K |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | TypeScript | Java |
| Last push | 2026-10-31 | 2026-10-30 |
| Forks | ⑂ 6.2K | ⑂ 1.5K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Hoppscotch if
- You weight community size — 81K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick kubernetes-client if
- You want the kubernetes-client feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Java
- You evaluated both and kubernetes-client fits your workflow better
About Hoppscotch
Hoppscotch Open Source API Development Ecosystem Built with ❤︎ by contributors We highly recommend you take a look at the Hoppscotch Documentation to learn more about the app. Support Features ❤️ Lightweight: Crafted with minimalistic UI design. ⚡️ Fast: Send requests and get responses in real time. 🗄️ HTTP Methods: Request methods define the type of action you are requesting to be performed. GET Requests retrieve resource information POST The server creates a new entry in a database PUT Updates an existing resource PATCH Very similar to PUT but makes a partial update on a resource DELETE Deletes resource or…
read the full Hoppscotch overview →
About kubernetes-client
Kubernetes & OpenShift Java Client This client provides access to the full Kubernetes & OpenShift REST APIs via a fluent DSL. Contents Usage Creating a client Configuring the client Loading resources from external sources Passing a reference of a resource to the client Adapting a client Adapting and close Generating CRD from Java Generating Java from CRD Mocking Kubernetes Who Uses Fabric8 Kubernetes Client? Kubernetes Operators in Java Written using Fabric8 Kubernetes Client Kubernetes and Red Hat OpenShift Compatibility Kubernetes Client CHEAT SHEET Kubectl Java Equivalents FAQs which includes details about…
read the full kubernetes-client overview →
More in Developer Tools
Related comparisons
More API Development & Testing projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the API Development & Testing field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Hoppscotch or kubernetes-client more popular?
Hoppscotch has 80,724 GitHub stars and kubernetes-client has 3,685. Hoppscotch has the larger community by that measure.
Are Hoppscotch and kubernetes-client free?
Both are open source. Hoppscotch is licensed under MIT and kubernetes-client under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Hoppscotch and kubernetes-client?
Hoppscotch is written in TypeScript and kubernetes-client in Java. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Hoppscotch or kubernetes-client?
Choose Hoppscotch if you want the larger community (80,724 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose kubernetes-client if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.