head to head · open source
Hoppscotch vs kiro-gateway
Hoppscotch has 80,724 GitHub stars, 6,225 forks, 820 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. kiro-gateway has 2,344 stars, 560 forks, 103 open issues and last shipped 6 months ago. Hoppscotch leads on adoption by 3,344% (80,724 vs 2,344 stars). Hoppscotch is written in TypeScript under MIT; kiro-gateway is written in Python under AGPL-3.0. Hoppscotch has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, kiro-gateway 24%. Hoppscotch was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Hoppscotch | kiro-gateway | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 81K | ★ 2.3K |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Written in | TypeScript | Python |
| Last push | 2026-10-31 | 2026-05-18 |
| Forks | ⑂ 6.2K | ⑂ 560 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Hoppscotch if
- You weight community size — 81K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick kiro-gateway if
- You want the kiro-gateway feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and kiro-gateway fits your workflow better
About Hoppscotch
Hoppscotch Open Source API Development Ecosystem Built with ❤︎ by contributors We highly recommend you take a look at the Hoppscotch Documentation to learn more about the app. Support Features ❤️ Lightweight: Crafted with minimalistic UI design. ⚡️ Fast: Send requests and get responses in real time. 🗄️ HTTP Methods: Request methods define the type of action you are requesting to be performed. GET Requests retrieve resource information POST The server creates a new entry in a database PUT Updates an existing resource PATCH Very similar to PUT but makes a partial update on a resource DELETE Deletes resource or…
read the full Hoppscotch overview →
About kiro-gateway
👻 Kiro Gateway Proxy gateway for Kiro API (Amazon Q Developer / AWS CodeWhisperer) 🇬🇧 English • 🇷🇺 Русский • 🇨🇳 中文 • 🇪🇸 Español • 🇮🇩 Indonesia • 🇧🇷 Português • 🇯🇵 日本語 • 🇰🇷 한국어 Made with ❤️ by @Jwadow Use Claude models from Kiro with Claude Code, OpenCode, OpenClaw, Claw Code, Codex app, Cursor, Cline, Roo Code, Kilo Code, Obsidian, OpenAI SDK, LangChain, Continue and other OpenAI or Anthropic compatible tools Models • Features • Quick Start • Configuration • 💖 Sponsor 🤖 Available Models (Free List) ⚠️ Important: Model availability depends on your Kiro tier (free/paid). The gateway provides…
read the full kiro-gateway overview →
More in Developer Tools
Related comparisons
More API Development & Testing projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the API Development & Testing field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Hoppscotch or kiro-gateway more popular?
Hoppscotch has 80,724 GitHub stars and kiro-gateway has 2,344. Hoppscotch has the larger community by that measure.
Are Hoppscotch and kiro-gateway free?
Both are open source. Hoppscotch is licensed under MIT and kiro-gateway under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Hoppscotch and kiro-gateway?
Hoppscotch is written in TypeScript and kiro-gateway in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Hoppscotch or kiro-gateway?
Choose Hoppscotch if you want the larger community (80,724 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose kiro-gateway if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.