head to head · open source
Hoppscotch vs ghapi
Hoppscotch has 80,336 GitHub stars, 6,112 forks, 820 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. ghapi has 686 stars, 69 forks, 49 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. Hoppscotch leads on adoption by 11,611% (80,336 vs 686 stars). Hoppscotch is written in TypeScript under MIT; ghapi is written in Python under Apache-2.0. Hoppscotch has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, ghapi 10%. Hoppscotch was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (api-client), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Hoppscotch | ghapi | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 80K | ★ 686 |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | TypeScript | Python |
| Last push | 2026-09-16 | 2026-09-14 |
| Forks | ⑂ 6.1K | ⑂ 69 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Hoppscotch if
- You weight community size — 80K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick ghapi if
- You want the ghapi feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and ghapi fits your workflow better
About Hoppscotch
Hoppscotch is an open source API development ecosystem that provides a full featured client for designing, testing, and documenting APIs. It operates as a web based application, desktop app, and CLI tool, supporting offline, on premises, and cloud deployments. Built with TypeScript and licensed under MIT, it serves as a direct open source alternative to proprietary tools like Postman and Insomnia.
read the full Hoppscotch overview →
About ghapi
ghapi ghapi v2 (July 2026) is now async by default. Every API call is now awaited: res = await api.repos.get() . Top level await works directly in Jupyter and modern REPLs; in scripts, use asyncio.run . For sync code (which should be largely compatible with v1), use GhApi(sync=True) . See the Sync usage section of the docs for details. To stay on the old version, pin ghapi Tab , and you’ll see all the operation groups available in the GitHub API that start with g . If you keep typing, e.g. ghapi git. , and hit Tab again, you’ll now see all the operations available in the git group, i.e: git.create blob git.create…
read the full ghapi overview →
More in Developer Tools
Related comparisons
More API Development & Testing projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the API Development & Testing field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Hoppscotch or ghapi more popular?
Hoppscotch has 80,336 GitHub stars and ghapi has 686. Hoppscotch has the larger community by that measure.
Are Hoppscotch and ghapi free?
Both are open source. Hoppscotch is licensed under MIT and ghapi under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Hoppscotch and ghapi?
Hoppscotch is written in TypeScript and ghapi in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Hoppscotch or ghapi?
Choose Hoppscotch if you want the larger community (80,336 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose ghapi if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.