head to head · open source
Hoppscotch vs fuego
Hoppscotch has 80,724 GitHub stars, 6,225 forks, 820 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. fuego has 1,775 stars, 128 forks, 18 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Hoppscotch leads on adoption by 4,448% (80,724 vs 1,775 stars). Hoppscotch is written in TypeScript under MIT; fuego is written in Go under MIT. Hoppscotch has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, fuego 7%. fuego was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Hoppscotch | fuego | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 81K | ★ 1.8K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | Go |
| Last push | 2026-10-31 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 6.2K | ⑂ 128 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Hoppscotch if
- You weight community size — 81K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick fuego if
- You want the fuego feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and fuego fits your workflow better
About Hoppscotch
Hoppscotch Open Source API Development Ecosystem Built with ❤︎ by contributors We highly recommend you take a look at the Hoppscotch Documentation to learn more about the app. Support Features ❤️ Lightweight: Crafted with minimalistic UI design. ⚡️ Fast: Send requests and get responses in real time. 🗄️ HTTP Methods: Request methods define the type of action you are requesting to be performed. GET Requests retrieve resource information POST The server creates a new entry in a database PUT Updates an existing resource PATCH Very similar to PUT but makes a partial update on a resource DELETE Deletes resource or…
read the full Hoppscotch overview →
About fuego
Fuego 🔥 The framework for busy Go developers 🚀 Explore and contribute to our 2025 Roadmap! 🚀 Production ready Go API framework generating OpenAPI documentation from code. Inspired by Nest, built for Go developers. Also empowers templating with html/template , a h/templ and maragudk/gomponents : see the example running live. Why Fuego? Chi, Gin, Fiber and Echo are great frameworks. But since they were designed a long time ago, [their current API does not allow them][gin gonic issue] to deduce OpenAPI types from signatures, things that are now possible with generics. Fuego offers a lot of "modern Go based"…
read the full fuego overview →
More in Developer Tools
Related comparisons
More API Development & Testing projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the API Development & Testing field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Hoppscotch or fuego more popular?
Hoppscotch has 80,724 GitHub stars and fuego has 1,775. Hoppscotch has the larger community by that measure.
Are Hoppscotch and fuego free?
Both are open source. Hoppscotch is licensed under MIT and fuego under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Hoppscotch and fuego?
Hoppscotch is written in TypeScript and fuego in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Hoppscotch or fuego?
Choose Hoppscotch if you want the larger community (80,724 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose fuego if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.