head to head · open source
Hoppscotch vs Firecamp
Hoppscotch has 80,724 GitHub stars, 6,225 forks, 820 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. Firecamp has 2,620 stars, 170 forks, 105 open issues and last shipped 8 months ago. Hoppscotch leads on adoption by 2,981% (80,724 vs 2,620 stars). Hoppscotch is written in TypeScript under MIT; Firecamp is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0. Hoppscotch has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, Firecamp 6%. Hoppscotch was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 3 topic tags (api, api-client, graphql), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Hoppscotch | Firecamp | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 81K | ★ 2.6K |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Written in | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-10-31 | 2026-03-04 |
| Forks | ⑂ 6.2K | ⑂ 170 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Hoppscotch if
- You weight community size — 81K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Firecamp if
- You want the Firecamp feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and Firecamp fits your workflow better
About Hoppscotch
Hoppscotch Open Source API Development Ecosystem Built with ❤︎ by contributors We highly recommend you take a look at the Hoppscotch Documentation to learn more about the app. Support Features ❤️ Lightweight: Crafted with minimalistic UI design. ⚡️ Fast: Send requests and get responses in real time. 🗄️ HTTP Methods: Request methods define the type of action you are requesting to be performed. GET Requests retrieve resource information POST The server creates a new entry in a database PUT Updates an existing resource PATCH Very similar to PUT but makes a partial update on a resource DELETE Deletes resource or…
read the full Hoppscotch overview →
About Firecamp
Firecamp Open Source Postman Alternative Firecamp Firecamp is a dx first API development platform that helps developers design, develop, test, and document their APIs effortlessly. With a user friendly interface and a range of powerful features, it streamlines the API development workflow and enhances collaboration among team members. 🌈 best in class developer experience inspired by vscode dx. 📡 multi protocol testing capabilities with Rest, GraphQL, Websocket, and SocketIO APIs. 👐 collaborate on API collections across the workspace and team ⛺ build APIs faster without switching between tools and apps…
read the full Firecamp overview →
More in Developer Tools
Related comparisons
More API Development & Testing projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the API Development & Testing field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Hoppscotch or Firecamp more popular?
Hoppscotch has 80,724 GitHub stars and Firecamp has 2,620. Hoppscotch has the larger community by that measure.
Are Hoppscotch and Firecamp free?
Both are open source. Hoppscotch is licensed under MIT and Firecamp under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Hoppscotch and Firecamp?
Hoppscotch is written in TypeScript and Firecamp in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Hoppscotch or Firecamp?
Choose Hoppscotch if you want the larger community (80,724 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Firecamp if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.