head to head · open source
Hoppscotch vs fastapi_mcp
Hoppscotch has 80,724 GitHub stars, 6,225 forks, 820 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. fastapi_mcp has 12,024 stars, 967 forks, 169 open issues and last shipped 11 months ago. Hoppscotch leads on adoption by 571% (80,724 vs 12,024 stars). Hoppscotch is written in TypeScript under MIT; fastapi_mcp is written in Python under MIT. Hoppscotch has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, fastapi_mcp 8%. Hoppscotch was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Hoppscotch | fastapi_mcp | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 81K | ★ 12K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | Python |
| Last push | 2026-10-31 | 2025-11-24 |
| Forks | ⑂ 6.2K | ⑂ 967 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Hoppscotch if
- You weight community size — 81K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick fastapi_mcp if
- You want the fastapi_mcp feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and fastapi_mcp fits your workflow better
About Hoppscotch
Hoppscotch Open Source API Development Ecosystem Built with ❤︎ by contributors We highly recommend you take a look at the Hoppscotch Documentation to learn more about the app. Support Features ❤️ Lightweight: Crafted with minimalistic UI design. ⚡️ Fast: Send requests and get responses in real time. 🗄️ HTTP Methods: Request methods define the type of action you are requesting to be performed. GET Requests retrieve resource information POST The server creates a new entry in a database PUT Updates an existing resource PATCH Very similar to PUT but makes a partial update on a resource DELETE Deletes resource or…
read the full Hoppscotch overview →
About fastapi_mcp
Built by Tadata FastAPI MCP Expose your FastAPI endpoints as Model Context Protocol (MCP) tools, with Auth! Features Authentication built in, using your existing FastAPI dependencies! FastAPI native: Not just another OpenAPI MCP converter Zero/Minimal configuration required just point it at your FastAPI app and it works Preserving schemas of your request models and response models Preserve documentation of all your endpoints, just as it is in Swagger Flexible deployment Mount your MCP server to the same app, or deploy separately ASGI transport Uses FastAPI's ASGI interface directly for efficient communication…
read the full fastapi_mcp overview →
More in Developer Tools
Related comparisons
More API Development & Testing projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the API Development & Testing field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Hoppscotch or fastapi_mcp more popular?
Hoppscotch has 80,724 GitHub stars and fastapi_mcp has 12,024. Hoppscotch has the larger community by that measure.
Are Hoppscotch and fastapi_mcp free?
Both are open source. Hoppscotch is licensed under MIT and fastapi_mcp under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Hoppscotch and fastapi_mcp?
Hoppscotch is written in TypeScript and fastapi_mcp in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Hoppscotch or fastapi_mcp?
Choose Hoppscotch if you want the larger community (80,724 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose fastapi_mcp if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.